False pretense must be interpreted by the courts and some circumstances automatically qualify as a false pretense, such as bigamy, when one of the parties is married already. This breaks the marriage contract and qualifies for a voiding of the marriage. Claiming to be 'with child', is a false pretense if a child is not born within 10 months of marriage. Impotence may qualify for a false pretense ruling under certain circumstances. If the courts decide your marriage should never have taken place then you make seek an annulment. The best advice is to visit a lawyer.
Answer:
c. actions followed by pleasurable consequences are more likely to occur
Explanation:
The law of effect by Edward Thorndike states that responses that produce a pleasurable consequence in a particular situation are more likely to occur again in that situation, and responses that produce a punishment or pain are less likely to occur again in that situation. This law was made in 1905 and it suggests that actions are based on consequences that might have occurred in the past.
Answer:
50% of the hatched chickens would be speckled, 25% would be black and 25% would be 25%
Explanation:
The black chickens are the dominant allele and the white chicken are the recessive allele. Since the black chicken is dominant, Let the genotype of the black chickens be (BB) and the genotype of the white chicken be (ww).
If the Black and white chicken are cross bred and the eggs hatched are black with white speckles, i.e (Bw). The genotype of all the hatched chickens would be (Bw). Where Bw is speckled chicken.
If the hatched chicken with genotype (Bw) are interbred, the resulting hatched chickens genotype would be BB, Bw, Bw and ww for four offsprings. This shows that 50% of the hatched chickens would be speckled, 25% would be black and 25% would be 25%
Answer:
hey! I don't know the answer, but I'm pretty positive it's on socratic:)
