Answer:
There are numerous advantages to the doctrine of judicial precedent. These advantages include;
1. It leads to certainty, consistency, and uniformity of laws.
2. It helps the court to save time, resources and energy since the court can easily refer an already decided case in which facts are similar to that which it is handling at the time in question.
3. It promotes fairness and justice where the facts of the present case are on all fours with that of an earlier decided case.
4. It leads to the quick and timely dispensation of justice.
The disadvantages are that:
1. It does not give room for judicial activism since it posits that already laid down judicial decision is to be followed, thus preventing legal development and advancement.
2. It leads to rigidity in the legal system and unnecessary restrictions on the advancement of the legal system.
Explanation:
Judicial Precedent otherwise known as the Doctrine of Stare Decisis is the principle of law that posit that court of lower jurisdiction are bound to follow the decisions of courts of higher jurisdiction that are on all fours with the matter that they are handling.
The answer is none of the above
The second option. That’s why we ended up having to get slaves because the indentured servants died so fast.
The origin of the term "Middle East" is considered to be in the British India Office during the 1850s. It was popularized by Alfred Thayer Mahan, an American naval strategist who was referring to the region between Arabia and India in 1902. Mahan's definition of the Middle East was the area around the Persian Gulf.
A follower of the religion, Islam, is called a Muslim.
Hope this helps!