About 63 miles
60 seconds x 60 minutes in an hour =3600 secs in 1 hr
3600/57.1=63.04728
Answer:
The correct answer is <u><em>B) Oversimplifications often ignore complex or contradictory evidence</em></u>
Explanation:
History is not always easy to study and the further we go back, the further we have to rely on second hand or third hand sources.
For example, in order to study something that happened 20 years ago is fairly easy since it would be recorded either in newspapers, books, or even video.
However, it is not always easy to draw conclusions when we are studying an event that took place 2,000 years ago.
Most of them times we rely on information passed on from generations before until finally someone wrote it down.
While many historians get tempted to Over-simply an event to draw certain conclusions, this should not be practiced as it creates a bias and forces us to study or even research for contradictory evidence. Sometimes, this contradictory evidence can completely change our understanding of the event.
"Troops carried bayonets as well as guns" is one example among the choices given in the question that <span>were examples of the change in weapons. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the third option or option "C". I hope that this is the answer that has come to your help.</span>
hey bestie! the answers are in order
hammurabi
solomon
hatshepsut
amon-re
akhenaton
hope you get a good grade!
Yes, the above statement is true.
The war of roses was
a dispute over the English throne by the Lancaster’s and the Yorks.
The final victory went
to Henry Tudor, a claimant of Lancastrian party, Henry defeats the
Yorkist forces and when Richard is killed, Henry comes to rule and successfully ending the Wars
of the Roses. This is called the war of roses because the emblem of the Yorkists was a white
rose and the emblem of Lancastrians was a red rose.
