No, (2 , 3) does not satisfy the inequality 4x + 3y > 20.
See attached picture:
~
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
<u>Given Data:</u>
Base area = 
= 108 in.²
Volume = V = 729 in.³
<u>Required:</u>
Height = h = ?
<u>Formula:</u>
<u>Solution:</u>
For h, rearranging formula:
![\displaystyle h = \frac{V}{A_{B}} \\\\h =\frac{729 \ in.^3}{108 \ in.^2} \\\\h = 6.75 \ in.\\\\\rule[225]{225}{2}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cdisplaystyle%20h%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7BV%7D%7BA_%7BB%7D%7D%20%5C%5C%5C%5Ch%20%3D%5Cfrac%7B729%20%5C%20in.%5E3%7D%7B108%20%5C%20in.%5E2%7D%20%5C%5C%5C%5Ch%20%3D%206.75%20%5C%20in.%5C%5C%5C%5C%5Crule%5B225%5D%7B225%7D%7B2%7D)
Answer:
$12.68
Step-by-step explanation:
Multiply the price of one pound by the amount of pounds you're buying,
8.45 x 1.5
= 12.675
Round up
= 12.68
Answer:
no, because for x=-3, y would have to be -31
Step-by-step explanation:
boy oh boy (or girl oh girl) - you wrote this in a horrible, horrible format.
I can only guess what your problem and the fitting answer would be.
y = -2×x^2 + 3×x - 4
-4 = -2×(-3)^2 + 3×(-3) - 4
-4 = -2×9 - 9 - 4
-4 = -18 - 9 - 4
-4 = -31
and that is wrong. for (-3,-4) to be on the graph of the function, y would have to be -4 when using x=-3 in the function. but y = -31 for x= -3.
Answer:
38633x794 =
30674602
Step-by-step explanation:
PLS MARK BRAINLIEST
