When I started thinking about three key stakeholders of a water utility company, it became a challenge I would never expect. Too many people are interested in it – government, unemployed people, banks, local authorities, and probably I made a wrong choice trying to make a shorter list – please note, these are only my ideas and I will try to explain them.
First, I asked myself without whom this company cannot exist. The answer is obvious: without Affected people such as households, families, and individuals. These people have an extremely high interest in receiving the supply of piped water, as well as in everything that is connected with improving the quality of this service. These people should be catered well; if the quality of the service is bad (e.g., the water is dirty, there is no water during some long periods of time, the fee is too high, etc.) – affected people might do several things, from applying to the court (and, actually, winning the case) to moving in order to change the water utility company.
The other two key stakeholders are the Government and Owners. The government is interested in improving water supply and sanitation services and is responsible for setting taxes, providing opportunities and guidance. The Government sets laws, taxes, and rules – every company must obey them and if it doesn’t, it will lose a lot of money and, probably, won’t exist for a long period of time. The water utility company plays a serious role in the daily life of hundreds and thousands of citizens, and in some cases when something goes wrong the Government can directly regulate how this company works to make sure that affected people are satisfied.
Answer: The court shouldn't grant either of them motion, due to the fact that the jury must determine whether the damage was due to the technician's installation of the improper cooling panel.
Explanation:
Based on the information given and assuming that both parties have moved for a directed verdict, then the court should not grant either of the motions.
The court shouldn't grant either of them motion, due to the fact that the jury must determine whether the damage was due to the technician's installation of the improper cooling panel.
The company can't afford to pay their employees. If you have 100$ you can have ten people working for 10$ an hour and pay everyone for one hour. You can't have 10 people getting paid 20$ because the company would lose money. So if they are paid 20$ per hour, the company can only afford to hire 5 employees.
The price elasticity of supply is given by a similar formula: If the percentage change in quantity demanded is greater than the percentage change in price, demand is said to be price elastic, or very responsive to price changes.
A service is any intangible offering that involves a deed, performance, or effort that cannot be physically possessed.
A service is a transaction in which no physical good is transferred to the buyer.
Some of the major properties of Services are:
Intangibility
Perishability
Uniqueness
Examples of services are Education, Consultancy, Repair and maintenance services, Electricians, Plumbing
, Law enforcement (provides the service of identifying and apprehending criminals) etc.
