Answer:
Birth control is taboo and banned in industrialized countries
Explanation:
The population growth in the industrialized countries has been on the decline for the past few decades. The are numerous reasons for this trend, but that the birth control is taboo and banned in industrialized countries is simply not true. The birth control is actually very popular, and people speak openly about it. It is used as a method of prevention of getting pregnant when it is not desirable, so it actually one of the factors that contribute a lot to the decline of the birth rates, not the other way around.
Some of the criticisms of the New Deal were:
- It could not end segregation
- It only empowered capitalism
- It still allowed wealth distribution to be unequal, etc.
<h3>What is the New Deal?</h3>
This was a government initiative that was proposed and implemented by President Franklin Delano Roosevelt to try and reduce unemployment and the harsh economic turmoils.
With this in mind, there were some criticisms of the New Deal by both the Democrats and Republicans and they included the accusations that it did not end segregation, it only empowered capitalism, etc.
Read more about New Deal here:
brainly.com/question/11739226
The position of the First Lady is not an elected one and carries only ceremonial duties. Nonetheless, first ladies have held a highly visible position in American society. The role of the First Lady has evolved over the centuries. She is, first and foremost, the hostess of the White House.
Answer: The comparison of Nicholas II and Vladimir Lenin
Explanation Both the leaders were hungry for power and came onto to become leaders by promising good for the people but the similarity didn't catch one's eye but how different to each historical figure was has been highlighted many a time.
- Nicholas II was czar and hence being born into a royal family made him an obvious leader whereas Lenin gained prominence in the party and came into power thus.
- Lenin had the willingness to lead Russia used the Bolshevik party to do so, however the Tsar was happy to be with his family and pets and not a bit interested in leadership.
- Nicholas II and his entire family were assassinated whereas Lenin died of natural causes way later.
- Lenin was the more brutal of the two and used his power to get what he wanted even if it meant torturing or murdering. here Nicholas made some concessions.
- The military responsibility was on Nicholas II during his regime but when Lenin took over he would delegate it.
Finally, none of them actually cared for the poor, the oppressed were further in distress when these two came to power.
