D: Congress could go around state government and act directly to individual citizens
Answer:
Legitimacy is the consent of the people to the government, their voluntary recognition of their right to make binding decisions. The lower the level of legitimacy, the more often the power will rely on coercive force. A legitimate action is one that is not contested by any of the “players” who have the right and opportunity to challenge the action. Legitimate governments gain their power by agreement with the governed. In accordance with the Declaration of Independence, government gaining their fair power from the consent of the governed are established to ensure the inalienable (natural) rights of citizens.
However, it is also obvious that achieving complete legitimacy also fails anywhere. The range of legitimacy is very wide: from popular approval to the complete denial of the regime. Even in developed democracies, citizens note significant flaws in the political system. In this regard, modern authors distinguish two main concepts of legitimacy: normative and descriptive.
The normative concept of legitimacy arises on the basis of the ethical formulation of the question: “How should power be created and act in order to have a moral right to demand assistance from citizens?” The normative understanding is based on the conformity of the political order with the values of justice and the common good. On the contrary, the descriptive concept of legitimacy comes from the actual state of affairs: do citizens consider the political order justified and whether they act accordingly. According to S. Lipset, legitimacy is evident if the system has managed to create and maintain among the people the conviction that the existing political institutions are most in the interests of this society. That is what is observed in modern American society.
Explanation:
Answer:
A powerful central government
Explanation:
There were fewer taxes back in that day, which angered colonists. Protests in rural Massachusetts turned into direct action in August 1786 after the state legislature adjourned without considering the many petitions that had been sent to Boston. On August 29, 1786, a well-organized force of protestors formed in Northampton, Massachusetts, and successfully prevented the county court from sitting. The insurgents were organized into three major groups and intended to surround and attack the armory simultaneously. Shays had one group east of Springfield near Palmer, Luke Day had a second force across the Connecticut River in West Springfield, and the force under Eli Parsons was to the north at Chicopee. The rebels had planned their assault for January 25, but Day changed this at the last minute and sent a message to Shays indicating that he would not be ready to attack until the 26th. Day's message was intercepted by Shepard's men, so the militia of Shays and Parsons approached the armory on the 25th not knowing that they would have no support from the west; instead, they found Shepard's militia waiting for them. Shepard first ordered warning shots fired over the heads of Shays' men, and then he ordered two cannons to fire grapeshot. Four Shaysites were killed and 20 wounded. There was no musket fire from either side, and the rebel advance collapsed.
