Answer: joint venture
Explanation:
The best structure fmtahts ideal for the collaboration between these two automotive giants will be a joint venture.
A joint venture is a form of business whereby two or more businesses come together and join their resources together so that they'll achieve a common goal.
When Ford and Toyota pool their resources together, this will bring about access to new markets, increased capacity, access to new knowledge, greater resources, and the improvement in income.
The main outputs of the developing the project team process are team performance assessments and enterprise environmental factors updates.
Hope this helps !
Photon
Answer:
Empowered
Explanation:
In the given scenario employees in Seneco have the freedom of controlling their work hours, location, and even pay plans. Employees also participate in all organization decisions, including what businesses Senco should pursue.
This is a form of employee empowerment.
Employee empowerment is the act of giving an employee autonomy in decision making regarding their welfare and activities affecting the organisation.
Employees are more involved in decisions affecting their work. This fosters a sense of commitment to the business.
The category that does not belong to the periodic evaluation is Change Analysis.
Option D is the correct answer.
<h3>What is a periodic evaluation?</h3>
Periodic evaluation is a technique that is totally developmental in nature and disregards the formal advice relating to tenure, retention, or promotion of employees.
Periodic evaluation has three broad categories namely, hazard analysis, safety, and health-related inspections, and evaluation relating to personal protective equipment (PPE).
Therefore, out of the provided options, Change analysis is not considered a category for periodic evaluation.
Learn more about the periodic evaluation. in the related link;
brainly.com/question/17095233
#SPJ1
Answer:
Three part test.
The outcome: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.
At the end, the law will be held.
Explanation:
In some cases, the courts are allowed to protect individual, company or business organization from Government interrupting with these individuals or business organization "fundamental right" and this is the "substantive due process rights " of insurance companies as mentioned in the question above.
The test that the United State Supreme Court can use to determine whether the regulations they want to enact would violate the substantive due process rights of insurance companies is what is known as the THREE PARR TEST.
THE THREE PART TEST has its root from cases such as that of Pasgraf V Long Island Railroad co. The three part test involves three main subjects and they are;
=> foreseeability: are the policies in which insurance companies work going to affect the consumers in the future?
=> proximity: what kind of relationship do the insurance companies have with there consumers?
=> fairness: are these policies just and fair?
CONCLUSION: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.
