Answer:
The correct answer is
B) Items that require adjusting entries.
good luck ❤
Helpful to businesses, but not particularly helpful in making personal buying decisions.
Answer: C. inefficiently low; inefficiently high
Explanation:
If the cotton farmers are not made to pay for the damage that their pesticides cost then they will maintain production at a relatively high level because their input costs will be relatively low. As a result of this high level of production, the price of the goods will be relatively low as well. The point at which both market equilibrium quantity and price are at in this scenario are considered inefficient because they are not taking into account, the true cost of production being the effects of the pesticides being used.
However, if they are made to pay for this negative externality that they are the cause of, it will increase their production cost and force them to reduce production to keep these costs low. As they reduce production, the market price will increase as supply is less.
Explanation:
I = Prt
I = (10000)(.11)(4) = $4400
Total Cost = Down Payment + Principal Borrowed + Interest
Total Cost = 2000 + 8000 + 4400
= $14,400
Monthly Payment = (Principal Borrowed + Total interest) / Total number of payments
Monthly Payment = (10,000 + 4400) / 48
= $300
APR= (2 × n × I) / [P × (N + 1)]
APR = (2 × 12 × 4400) / [10,000 × (48+1)]
= 21.55%
Answer: False
Explanation:
When the government subsidies production of a good, it leads to a rise in the supply of the good. The supply curve shifts down to the right leading to a <em>fall in the price level</em>. But the <em>equilibrium quantity increases</em>.
Thus, the given statement is false that if the government decides to subsidize the production of a good, the result would be a decrease in the equilibrium price and a decrease in the equilibrium quantity.
