The moust important one is the one
Answer:
A:observing how people and things are described
Explanation:
Answer:
<em>Rana told her that she will follow her.</em>
Explanation:
Changing a speech from the direct to the indirect form requires certain changes to the sentence. This includes removing the quotation marks/ speech marks, then replacing the pronouns as required. Moreover, the tense of the speech will depend on the frame of the sentence.
In the given direct speech, the "I" refers to Rana, and the "you" in her speech means the girl she's talking to. Thus, the indirect speech for the given sentence will be-
<em>Rana told her that she will follow her.</em>
We change the "shall" of the speech because shall is used for first-person whereas in the indirect speech, the I becomes "she" as it refers to Rana.
Thus, the correct sentence is
<u><em>Rana told her she will follow her.</em></u>
Pretty sure it’s D! it’s definitely not A or B, it is nonfiction. and I believe it’s D because it’s description not persuasion
Answer:
Classical decomposition requires the study of the space the art takes place in, the color composition if applicable, the lines and flow of the work, the technique used, and the emotion and intellectual response it evokes. The space in which the art takes place could be the phsyical setting, the division of space in the work itself (common in paintings) and how it interacts with the space (negative vs. positive space.) The color composition is important in how the colors chosen relate to the work (or the lack there of). The lines and flow of the work tend to pertain more to visual works but anyone that has evaluated the artwork in automotive design know full well the importance of lines in the work. The technique is important especially in phsyical artwork such as sculpture and relief painting. This is also crucial in multimedia work and abstract sculpture. The last part, largely subjective, is what the work solicits from the viewer. Art without emotion could be argued ... isn't art. Andy Worhol explored this idea with pop art (cambell soup can anyone?) on what is the nature of art. Art is either everywhere (in your spoon, fork, stapler, etc.) or some rare thing (a painting by Raphel verus the macroni happy face the 4 year old did) and if it is a rare thing then what does the art have to convey? What elevates art from engineering then? This last part is solely the responsibility of the critic rather then the artist. An artist always sees their art as art, but what prompts the view to consider it art and what steps does the work take to make a believer out of the viewer.
Explanation:
did it help ?
