Answer: Option (c) is correct.
Explanation:
Option (c) is not a disadvantage of a divisional type of organizational structure. All the other options are the disadvantages of a divisional organizational structure.
The divisional structure has drawbacks, including conceivably scattering specialized ability and skill or fostering unfortunate competitions among divisions. The divisional structure likewise may build costs by requiring useful pros and better qualified administrators for every division. Additionally, on the grounds that there is an overemphasis on divisional as opposed to organizational objectives, the divisional structure may bring about copying assets and endeavors -, for example, staff administrations, offices and work force - crosswise over divisions.
Answer:
adult; inelastic.
Explanation:
Data provided in the question
Increase wage rate percentage is 10%
And, the given supply percentage is 7%
As there is no information given in the question related to the teenager and adult so we assume that the data is given for adult
Since the wage rate is increase by 10% which reflects the adults worker and due to which the supply is 7% more labor. So the elasticity of labor supply is inelastic as the supply is less than the wage rate so it cannot be perfectly elastic
Answer:
Ricci vs. DeStefano
Explanation:
This case is a US labor law case that occurred in 2009, where twenty (20) firefighters at the New Haven Fire Department claimed to be discriminated against because they were refused promotion despite the fact that they passed the test.
More noticeably, no blacks and a very small number of Hispanics qualified for the promotion.
The result of the lawsuit was that $2 million was paid to the firefighter plaintiffs and New Haven reestablished the results and promoted 14 out of the 20 plaintiffs. For fees and costs, their attorney Karen Lee Torre was paid $3 million.
Answer:Governments intervene in markets to address inefficiency. In an optimally efficient market, resources are perfectly allocated to those that need them in the amounts they need. In inefficient markets that is not the case; some may have too much of a resource while others do not have enough. Inefficiency can take many different forms. The government tries to combat these inequities through regulation, taxation, and subsidies. Most governments have any combination of four different objectives when they intervene in the market.
Maximizing Social Welfare
In an unregulated inefficient market, cartels and other types of organizations can wield monopolistic power, raising entry costs and limiting the development of infrastructure. Without regulation, businesses can produce negative externalities without consequence. This all leads to diminished resources, stifled innovation, and minimized trade and its corresponding benefits. Government intervention through regulation can directly address these issues.
Another example of intervention to promote social welfare involves public goods. Certain depletable goods, like public parks, aren’t owned by an individual. This means that no price is assigned to the use of that good and everyone can use it. As a result, it is very easy for these assets to be depleted. Governments intervene to ensure those resources are not depleted.
Macro-Economic Factors
Governments also intervene to minimize the damage caused by naturally occurring economic events. Recessions and inflation are part of the natural business cycle but can have a devastating effect on citizens. In these cases, governments intervene through subsidies and manipulation of the money supply to minimize the harsh impact of economic forces on its constituents.
Socio-Economic Factors
Governments may also intervene in markets to promote general economic fairness. Government often try, through taxation and welfare programs, to reallocate financial resources from the wealthy to those that are most in need. Other examples of market intervention for socio-economic reasons include employment laws to protect certain segments of the population and the regulation of the manufacture of certain products to ensure the health and well-being of consumers.
Explanation:
ok
Answer:
Proportional tax system
Explanation:
A proportional tax system levies an equal tax rate on everyone regardless of their income level. It is also known as the flat-rate tax because it treats the wealthy, middle class, and low-income earners equally. The proportional tax system simplifies tax filing as the same tax rate will apply to everyone.
The proportions tax system contrasts with the progressive tax system, which bases the tax rate on the taxpayer's income.
