Answer:
=$46,500
Explanation:
Retained earning = beginning retained earning+ earnings - dividends.
For Pierson Industries
Beginning retained earnings is $42,000
revenues are $104,800
expenses $97,300
Dividends paid out $3,500
Earning for the period will be revenue minus expenses
=$104,800 - $97,300=$7,500
retained earnings are the end of the year will be
= $42,500+$7,500 -$3,500
=$50,000 -$3,500
=$46,500
Answer:
The inventory would be increased by $55,283 and the profit has been decreased by the same amount.
Explanation:
The reason is that the closing inventory has been increased by the difference of the correct and incorrect amount which is:
Closing inventory difference = $225,513 - $170,230 = $55,283
This will increase the closing inventory in the balance sheet and the increase in the closing inventory will decrease the cost of goods sold. The lower the cost of goods sold the greater is the profit.
Answer:
B.utilizing its total assets more efficiently than Sam's
Explanation:
Dee's has a fixed asset turnover rate of 1.12 and a total asset turnover rate of 0.91. Sam's has a fixed asset turnover rate of 1.15 and a total asset turnover rate of 0.88. Both companies have similar operations.
Based on this information, although Sam seems to be utilizing its fixed assets more efficiently, <u>Dee's must be doing utilizing its total assets more efficiently than Sam's</u>
<u>The fixed asset turnover ratio is an efficiency ratio that measures a companies return on their investment in property, plant, and equipment by comparing net sales with fixed assets. In other words, it calculates how efficiently a company is a producing sales with its machines and equipment.</u>
Dee's has a total asset turnover rate of 0.91 compared to a total asset turnover rate of 0.88 by Sam. Hence Dee's efficiency is higher.
Answer:
Each should be used as follows:
Weight of peppermints = X = 25 lb
Weight of Chocolates = Y = 15 lb
Explanation:
Suppose
Weight of peppermints = X
Weight of Chocolates = Y
So According to given condition
X + Y = 40 (Eq. 1)
1.2X + 2.4Y = 1.65*40
1.2X + 2.4Y = 66 (Eq. 2)
By multiplying (Eq. 1) with 1.2 we get
1.2X + 1.2Y = 48 (Eq. 3)
Now by subtracting (Eq. 2) from (Eq. 3)
(1.2X + 1.2Y) - (1.2X + 2.4Y) = 48 - 66
1.2X + 1.2Y - 1.2X - 2.4Y = -18
1.2X - 1.2X + 1.2Y - 2.4Y = -18 (Rearrange)
-1.2Y = -18
1.2Y = 18
Y = 18/1.2
Y = 15
By placing value of Y in (Eq. 1)
X + 15 = 40
X = 40 - 15
X = 25
<u>Check</u>
1.2X + 2.4Y = 66
1.2 (25) + 2.4 (15) = 66
66 = 66
Granting access to a user based upon how high up he is in an organization violates "the principle of least privileges."
As the principle of least privileges states that a person should be given only those privileges that are needed or are necessary to perform a specific job or task and nothing more.
The principle of least privileges states that you assign users the minimum set of privileges which they require to do their jobs, according to their roles.
The principle of least privilege prevents the spread of malware on your network. An administrator or superuser with access to a lot of other network resources and infrastructure could potentially end up spreading malware to all those other systems which he gets access to.
Hence, if the organization grants access to a user based upon how high up he is then the organization violates the principle of least privileges.
To learn more about the least privileges here:
brainly.com/question/27034248
#SPJ4
