1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mrs_skeptik [129]
3 years ago
6

How did Czar respond to those who disagree with him

History
1 answer:
mixas84 [53]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

The final Tsars were increasingly ineffective and when Tsar Nicholas II came into power he did not fix the mistakes of the past Tsars and due to his bad leadership he is solely to blame for bringing his country into ruin which in turn led to his downfall, however, the people of Russia were eager for change because of the mistakes of the past Tsars and Nicholas II could not govern the entire country and keep them from wanting a revolution.

You might be interested in
Who does Napoleon fight at Waterloo?
ziro4ka [17]

Answer:Duke of Wellington

At Waterloo in Belgium, Napoleon Bonaparte suffers defeat at the hands of the Duke of Wellington, bringing an end to the Napoleonic era of European history. The Corsica-born Napoleon, one of the greatest military strategists in history, rapidly rose in the ranks of the French Revolutionary Army during the late 1790s.

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
The Middle Passage was part of the larger trade network known as "__________."
brilliants [131]
Answer: Triangular Trade.

What the middle passage is: it is part of the trade where they trade enslaved African Americans
6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The politics philosophy Qin Shi Huang Wong implemented during his Reign was ​
xeze [42]

Answer:

legalism................

8 0
3 years ago
What happened at the LA Summit in 1999 held at Venice Beach, California?
Zanzabum

Answer:

Here you go :)

Explanation:

LOS ANGELES -- The American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California today said it will represent Asia Yu, the organizer of the 1999 B-Boy Summit, who was charged by the police department here with inciting a riot.

Even though Yu and her organization, Eternal Two Creations, held the appropriate permits for the February 28 dance performance and exhibition held at Venice Beach, the Los Angeles Police Department is charging her with inciting a riot. The ACLU contends that it was the actions of the LAPD, and not those of the B-Boy Summit organizers, which caused the confusion along Venice Beach and the Boardwalk.

The events of February 28, including the disproportionate tactics taken by the LAPD, were captured on videotape by a number of participants and clearly support the B-Boy Summit organizers contention that the crowd was law abiding and orderly.

"One look at these tapes and it is clear that the LAPD reacted with fear and force to what was obviously a minor problem,"" said John Duran, an ACLU cooperating attorney representing Yu. "While hundreds of hip-hop fans enjoyed a legally permitted dance performance on the beach, the LAPD launched a tactical force to deal with a perceived threat that was, in fact, a figment of their imagination."

The events of that Sunday were in marked contrast to those of the two previous days of the Summit, which was held on the UCLA campus. More than 2,000 people from across the United States and from around the globe attended the 5th annual B-Boy Summit.

Seminars on a wide range of topics from 'Women in Hip-Hop' to 'Y2K: Urban Survival' drew record attendance and no reports of violence or vandalism.

"The hip-hop culture allows youth freedom to express themselves through dance, music and art and promotes a code of respect and understanding of all peoples and cultures," Yu said. "What the LAPD did that day, was directly contrary to the non-violent values that hip-hop advocates."

Ramona Ripston, Executive Director of the ACLU of Southern California, said that what happened on Venice Beach was a sweeping violation of free speech and basic civil liberties.

"There is no justification for LAPD officers training their rifles on innocent people, gathered at a peacable assembly," Ripston said. "We are calling on the LAPD to meet with us to make sure nothing like this ever happens again."

6 0
2 years ago
According to Hinduism, to go against dharma leads to bad karma, while living according to dharma brings good karma. explain why
aivan3 [116]

Answer:

Due to ideology and belief.

Explanation:

To go against dharma leads to bad karma, while living according to dharma brings good karma, this is true in Hinduism because this is the ideology of Hindu religion and their belief on the eternal concept of atman. Dharma means religion or religious values while karma means the result of action. Those individuals which go against religion, the result of this action will be bad while if the individuals which follow religion, the result of this action will be good.

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is a benefit of a confederate government
    7·1 answer
  • Why is protein intake important after workouts?
    10·2 answers
  • A policy that tries to avoid foreign alliances and involvement is called A) imperialism. B) isolationism. C) nationalism. D) res
    7·2 answers
  • Why did true man believe Greece needed Americanaid in 1947
    12·2 answers
  • What were three causes of the Great Depression?
    7·2 answers
  • What are 3 reasons countries might go to war
    15·1 answer
  • What group helped write the Declaration of Independence?
    6·1 answer
  • How did Aśoka’s conversion to Buddhism change the way he governed the Mauryan Empire?
    15·1 answer
  • On a test, help would he lovely.
    15·2 answers
  • How did Standard Oil eliminate its competition?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!