1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
irga5000 [103]
3 years ago
13

The benefits of USA in experience of having minerals and the disadvantages of having minerals​

History
1 answer:
Anuta_ua [19.1K]3 years ago
7 0

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

The benefits of USA in the experience of having minerals:

-Minerals allow for the economic exploitation of raw materials.

-It is a good source of income for this industry.

-Minerals can be exported and are highly demanded by other nations.

-The exploitation of minerals has created thousands of jobs in the country.

The disadvantages of having minerals:​

-Mining damages the land. Dynamite explosions are needed to dig in the dirt.

-This industry damages the ecology of the place. It is not good for the environment and the wildlife.

-Mining towns that once were very productive end up being ghost towns.

You might be interested in
In the first elections for President of the
shtirl [24]

Answer:

the answer is B. The person who won second place in the election became

hope it helps!

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Before World War II, the context for radical political parties was opened because of what factor?
svetlana [45]

The most important factor from the options that lead to radicalized political parties was The Great Depression of 1929 (C).

The Wall Street Crash of 1929 led to a chain reaction not only in the U.S. but in many European countries as well. In the worst moments of the period, 22 to 23% of the American workforce, and 44% of German's workforce didn't have a job.

Due to the crisis, many American creditors charged loans made throughout the world; American companies stopped investing in other countries.

This generalized crisis, unemployment, and increasing misery of the population created a fertile soil on which fascist and nazi political figures fed.

3 0
3 years ago
In which year did no candidate win a majority of electoral votes?
nata0808 [166]

Answer:

Hayes in 1876 and Benjamin Harrison in 1888—became president without winning the popular vote. In the 1824 election between John Quincy Adams and Andrew Jackson, Jackson won the popular vote but neither won a majority of Electoral College votes.

7 0
3 years ago
The role of women in american society before , and during the world war 1
lions [1.4K]

Answer:

Before WWI the role of a woman was usually to take care of a house and care for children. They werent allowed to have jobs or hold property without having a husband. But when the war came and men were drafted there was a labor shortage so the role for women changed radically as they made up most of the work force.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the industrial revolution make it difficult for the poor
liberstina [14]

It is generally agreed that the impact of the industrial revolution was negative for children. In the industrial districts, children tended to enter the workforce at younger ages. Many of the new factory owners preferred to employ children as they viewed them more docile tractable than adults. Although most families channelled their children's earnings into providing a better diet for them, the physical toll of working in the factories was very great and led to detrimental outcomes for children.[1]

Children were preferred workers in textile mills because they worked for lower wages. Child labourers tended to be orphans, children of widows, or from the poorest families. Children were needed for low pay, and nimble fingers. Child labor was not an invention of the industrial revolution, they were first exploited by their parents on the farm.The impact of the industrial revolution on adults is more complex and has been the subject of extensive debate amongst historians for the past one hundred years. Optimists have argued that industrialisation brought higher wages and better living standards to most people. Pessimists have argued that these gains have been over-exaggerated. They argue that wages did not rise significantly during this period, and furthermore, that whatever economic gains were actually made - these must be offset against the worsening health and housing of the new urban sectors.[3] Since the 1990s, many contributions to the standard of living debate has tilted towards the pessimist interpretation. Most of the work has been within the economic history framework. There have been attempts to measure variables such as real wages, mortality, and heights. More recently the historian Emma Griffin has marked a departure from this approach by using a large number of working-class autobiographies to consider how working people themselves conceived of these changes. She has argued that some working men did see improvements in their lives at this time, through higher wages and a greater degree of autonomy and self-determination.

<span>[4]Safety was very poor in early industrial factories and mines and there was no injury compensation for the workers as well. The injuries from machinery would cause whole finger to be cut off, mild burns, severe arms and legs injuries, amputation of limbs and death. However, diseases and cancer were the most common health issues that had long-term effects to the workers. Cotton mills, coal mines, iron-works, and brick factories all had bad air, which caused chest diseases, coughs, blood-spitting, hard breathing, pains in chest, and sleepless nights for the workers.Housing for the workers were overcrowded and unclean, making it suitable for the hazards of typhoid, cholera, and smallpox. Workers during these times did not have sick days, and forced themselves to work to provide money to support the family. Traditionally women and girls were always in charge of cleaning the house, but since the women were spending just as much time working as the men, they had no time to clean the house. The housing was tiny, dirty, and sickly for the working laboring class during the Industrial Revolution, and the workers had no personal time to clean or change their own atmosphere even if they wished to</span>


6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did Egypt’s location affect the development of its civilization?
    15·1 answer
  • Why do people obey orders that are unjust or immoral? Are they responsible for their<br> actions?
    14·2 answers
  • Which of the following did the Treaty of Paris make possible?o the Albany Plan of Union?
    12·1 answer
  • Give me 2 reasons why Paul Revere is a hero
    9·1 answer
  • Major challengers to Portuguese traders in east Asia were _____ ,
    14·2 answers
  • Which agreement gave the united states complete control of the oregon territory?
    9·1 answer
  • . What important contribution did the Bantu people make to the development of the African continent?
    7·1 answer
  • How did the industrial revolution give an advantage to industrialized European nations over non-industrialized nations?
    15·1 answer
  • _______ has no countries, no currency and no population.
    14·1 answer
  • How was the coal industry affected by the great depression
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!