Was the monroe doctrine an appropriate foreign policy statement for the United states in 1823

1 answer:

4 0

The Monroe doctrine was a intercontinental statement from the US, basically stating that the nation would not seek land in other parts of the world if other parts of the world did not seek land in the US. This became about due to tensions of other nations, fighting over Oregon. After the US purchased the Louisiana Territory from France in 1800, an expedition was sent all the way to the west coast to determine the expanse of land that was to be cultivated. Ultimately, it was appropriate for the foreign policy statement to be issued, as the United States spent a fortune of money, that was really not allowed to be spent by Jefferson at all, on that territory. The other nations were really just trying to get a piece of it, even though the land was rightfully belonging to the US.

You might be interested in

Which US president led the process of expansion by gaining Oregon Territory and pursuing war with Mexico?

Len [333]

James K. Polk..........

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Indian farmers depended on the to bring water for thier crops

Nadya [2.5K]

Rain??? idk seems right

6 0

3 years ago

What were the external pressures and the internal divisions and weaknesses that led to the breakup of much of the ottoman empire

aniked [119]

Internal divisions were came from various sides. For starters, numerous and various ethnic groups started becoming nationalized more and more and wanted to gain their independence. This was seen in areas such as the Balkans where Ottomans started losing more and more influence. They also had problems with their own people because of a need of modernization which was severely lacking in the Ottoman empire which was underdeveloped compared to other European states and empires.

External pressures were mostly financially related. At one point in time, the Ottoman empire had such high national debt that paying the annual rates took more than half of the revenue from the yearly budget. Their armies were also dwindling so it was easy for others to remove them from their territory such as what Egypt did after a few wars.

7 0

3 years ago

Which country launched World War II with an invasion of Poland in 1939?

sesenic [268]

Invasion of Poland
Date 1 September – 6 October 1939 (1 month and 5 days)
Location Poland, Eastern Germany, and the Free City of Danzig
Result Decisive German and Soviet victory Beginning of World War II

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Help! History is NOT my strong subject!

loris [4]

Answer:

No, think that anti-federalism is better. Anti-federalism focuses on giving states their own local governments, and also having a national government. I think this is a way to make sure the country stays a democracy, and make sure laws can apply to the different climate and people of their state. A strong federal government is needed to keep the country together and protect unalienable rights, but states should be able to decide the rest.

Explanation:

8 0

3 years ago