Answer:
b. For 100 additional burglaries in California one expects to see an increase of about 3 burglaries in Hawaii.
Step-by-step explanation:
The slope gives the increase in the independent variable per unit increase in the dependent variable. Hence, a reasonable interpretation for the slope would be ;
the rate of change in the number of burglaries in Hawaii per 100 unit change in number of burglaries in California is 3.
Hence, for 100 additional burglaries in California, the rate of change in the number of burglaries in Hawaii is 3.
Answer:
It would end at 9:38
Step-by-step explanation:
but obviously it is not one of the answer choices, so I would go with 9:42
Answer:
16/31 days
Step-by-step explanation:
Add up all the days: 15+10+6=31
Add up the days with no rain: 10+6=16
With no rain as numerator and total as denominator you get an answer of 16/31
Answer:
Option: D is correct.
Step-by-step explanation:
since we are given a inequality as:
Clearly from the graph of the following inequality we could see that the origin is included in the shaded region and the shaded area is below the line.
Also it could be seen that if we put the origin points i.e. (0,0) in the inequality than 0<2 and the condition is true and hence origin is included in the shaded area.
Hence, option D is true.
I think it would be 137.1, due to the total being 360. Just subtract.
