(Take this response with a grain of salt.)
I personally think that neither should determine that. Both questions are unable to determine whether the religion is true; so why would it be used to determine whether or not people have the right to follow it. However, putting that aside, I think the best answer would be how good their followers are. It doesn't determine whether the religion is true or not but it rids us of the toxic religions that spread negative messages. Considering how much racism, homophobia, transphobia, and sexism is in most religions it'd be interesting to see most religions cease.
Including commonly followed religions like Catholicism.
The correct answers are a. learning and the arts flourished, supported by the thriving gupta economy and c. gupta artisans produced goods sold locally and as far away as the middle east and southeast asia
These are evidence that explain their prosperity.
Answer:
The Consitiution. Inflamed by the king's stonewalling of their appeals, the Founders embedded the right to petition into the Constitution by way of the First Amendment.
It essentially said that the Jews were not human and were to be treated as such. The goal of the Nuremburg Laws was to distinguish what Nazi Germany perceived as ethnically pure and impure populations. It assigned people with Jewish heritage as property of the state, giving them no rights. Jews were also strictly prohibited from reproducing. The Nuremburg laws also gave strict ethnic standards to the rest of the German people, which classified them based on their ancestors race.
Answer:
Explanation:
I believe the answer is C. under the articles of confederation there were many things the federal government couldn’t do. However the voting process was virtually unaffected.
pls report if i’m wrong, hope dis helps.
