1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vlad1618 [11]
4 years ago
10

An independent regulatory agency

Social Studies
2 answers:
Virty [35]4 years ago
6 0
An independent regulatory agency is part of the executive branch. The answer to your question is C. I hope that this is the answer that you were looking for and it has helped you.
Bogdan [553]4 years ago
6 0

The correct answer is C. Is part of the executive branch

Explanation:

In politics, an independent regulatory agency is a type of organization or agency whose main purpose is to supervise and regulate certain aspects of government, these are called independent because they do not influence politics. Although they are usually considered part of the executive branch as they still deal with the government and they enforce the law. Examples of this type of agencies include the Consumer Product Safety Commission or the  Food and Drug Administration, that are permanent agencies that regulated and supervise law. Thus, it can be concluded an independent regulatory agency is part of the executive branch.

You might be interested in
What is a district ?​
Harlamova29_29 [7]

Answer:

<em>An area of a country or city, especially one characterized by a particular feature or activity is called a district .</em>

3 0
3 years ago
Which statement best describes social classes in colonial society? A. Indentured servants and enslaved workers made up the lowes
lana66690 [7]

Answer:

C. Artisans, shopkeepers, and farmers made up a large middle class, but the gentry held the most power and wealth.

Explanation:

In New England and the mid-Atlantic colonies, the elite were wealthy farmers or urban merchants; in the South, they were wealthy planters. Hope this helps!

8 0
3 years ago
Michaels skillfully uses wit and humor at strategic moments in his essay. Consider, for example, such lines as "what poor people
oksian1 [2.3K]

Answer:

1. The benefit is that is passes the general message in a surreal manner, the intended message is passed but with a little sense of wit and humor which would create a soft landing on the readers mind without taking away the seriousness of the message  passed.

2. Michael risks losing the attention of a few sentimental sect i.e, poor people that feel the joke was not necessary and that shots were taken at them. Not everyone is humorous.

3. The message would still be effective regardless only that, the humor embedded won;t be present and readers that love such would feel what was written was too serious lol.

4. 'The wounded eagle glided as fast as a kite in a storm', this implied that the manner with which the eagle was gliding down, it look as though it was a kite basking in the euphoria of the wind. In a serious tone, it can go like this; 'The wounded eagle quickly sought a resting place'.

Second example is ' Chelsea broke the bones of Manchester United like she was the grim reaper'. With a serious tone; 'Chelsea won Manchester United squarely'

5. Changing the tone made the argument more serious and focused on the intending point.

6. Not necessarily, it all depends on the reader but these days, authors try to spice up stories with a little bit of humor to ensure the attention of their readers stays intact and to also eliminate any chance of boredom.

6 0
3 years ago
Why do you think European nations supported the colonists rather than great britain
Umnica [9.8K]
A lot of European nations, such as France, were actually enemies of Great Britain, as many of the countries in Europe fought against each other for power, land and resources. So they would support the colonists, just because it would weaken Great Britain.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which is a guideline for dealing with conflict?
lana [24]

The proper answer for this question would be:

Two answers would be is to “remain at the topic at hand” most people tend to stray from the conflict that they are faced with, and without any solution to solve the problem. Another is to “always discuss the issue in a group setting” or to an individual person whom you trust to hear different opinions from other people, so you will eventually find the right answer. These are two of the guidelines that would help in solving a conflict, it is the proper way to establish good communication with other people and to prevent any problems from getting bigger.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • I need some motivation to help me not quit school. Lol.
    10·1 answer
  • In order to avoid discomfort in the summer, the architect wants living areas _____ in the afternoon. exposed to the sun protecte
    14·1 answer
  • Describe the four types of cases that must be heard by a federal court.
    10·1 answer
  • Why did the english want a colony in north america?
    13·1 answer
  • (this is not social studies related. I accidentally pressed Social Studies) What advice would you give to someone about loyalty?
    12·1 answer
  • A utility company that provides electricity to a large portion of a county is an example of a natural monopoly good in demand co
    7·1 answer
  • What three changes in Earth's movement in space might result in long term climate changes
    7·1 answer
  • 'Diverse and unique culture is our national pride' .
    5·1 answer
  • What do you think is the future of global governance in our changing world?
    10·1 answer
  • Ethnomethodologists explore __________ assumptions about how the world operates that underlie our behavior.
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!