Answer:
intimate terrorism
Explanation:
An intimate terrorism can be referred to as the presence of physical assault by a relationship partner; the partners could be a current partner or an ex partner.
The physical assault is in such a way that varieties of tactics are used to maintain control over the other person in the relationship
As mentioned earlier, intimate terrorism involved physical assaults and it can assume any of the following forms; it could be physical, verbal, emotional, economic and sexual abuse.
The Special Court of Appeals’ arguments that Dabney could not commit attempted fourth-degree burglary is that thinking of the crime does not make you a criminal and thus, the defendant can not be convicted of a non-exsitence crime.
<h3>What is the case of Dabney v. State?</h3>
The defender "Dabney" was convicted for attempt 4th degree burglary but appealed on the grounds he did not actually commit it.
Hence, he could not be convicted of actus reus of being on the property no criminal significance in its own right absent the mens rea of an intent to commit theft.
Read more about Dabney v. State
brainly.com/question/26537644
#SPJ1
Answer: BY THE THREE ARMS OF GOVERNMENT (THE EXECUTIVE,THE LEGISLATURE AND THE JUDICIARY)
Explanation:The three arms of Government are an example of the constitutional principle of checks and balance.
Check and balance is the concept enshrined in the a Democratic Constitution where each of the arms of Government act as a watch for the other arm.
The legislature checkmates the activities of The Executive to prevent abuse of Power they can summon the Executive arm if they discovered any anomally.
The Judiciary have the powers to interpret laws to bring about fairness and justice for both the Executive and legislative arms.
The Executive through the president has the power not to sign bills passed by the legislature if it is not in line with existing laws.etc
