Answer:
The United States first amendment carried more protection and less restriction in its implementation and here is why.
The edict of the United States does not qualify the application of the clause granting freedom of expression. That of the United Kingdom does. In doing so, it ensures that Freedom of Expression is used appropriately in that it must be targeted at the common good and the well being of the state.
It states, for instance, that
<em>"Public authorities may restrict this right if they can show that their action is lawful, necessary and proportionate in order to:
</em>
- <em>
protect national security, territorial integrity (the borders of the state) or public safety
</em>
- <em>prevent disorder or crime
</em>
- <em>protect health or morals
</em>
- <em>protect the rights and reputations of other people
</em>
- <em>prevent the disclosure of information received in confidence
</em>
- <em>maintain the authority and impartiality of judges"</em>
Cheers!
Answer:Court Structure
Explanation:The Constitution and laws of each state establish the state courts. A court of last resort, often known as a Supreme Court, is usually the highest court. ... Below these appeals courts are the state trial courts. Some are referred to as Circuit or District Courts.
Answer:
B. Decriminalization
Explanation:
He is guilty of possession but due to decriminalization in his State he won't be arrested
Answer:
Maybe c) is the answer cuz they didn't take any action regarding this issue
Answer:
first pic (with calculator pic on it)
1) 45
2) 32
second pic (with paperclip on it)
1) 30
2) 24
3rd pic (with scissors on it)
1) 30
2) 18
Explanation:
