1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lbvjy [14]
3 years ago
7

An apartment building contains twenty units. Each unit rents for $900 per month. The vacancy rate is 5%. Annual expenses are $17

,500 for maintenance, $7,200 insurance, $7,500 taxes, $6,400 utilities, $7,500 mortgage debt and 10% of the gross effective income for the management fee. What was the investor's rate of return for the property if she paid $1,170,000 for the property?
Business
1 answer:
sergij07 [2.7K]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The question is missing below options:

A.7.6%

B.8.9%

C.12.48%

D.22.05%

The correct option is C,12.48%

Explanation:

Note the difference between my 12.49% and the 12.48% is due rounding error.

The computation is shown below:

Annual property rent ($900*20*12)                      $216,000.00  

Less; provision for vacancy (5%* 216,000)           ($10,800.00)

Effective gross income                                           $205,200.00  

deduct:

maintenance  expenses                                         ($17,500.00)

Insurance                                                                ($7,200.00)

taxes                                                                   ($7,500.00)

Utilities                                                                     ($6,400.00)

management fee(10%*$205,200)                         <u>($20,520.00) </u>

Net operating income                                            <u> $146,080.00</u>  

Property investment                                                <u>$1,170,000.00</u>

Investor's rate of return(net operating income/initial investment)

investor'r rate of return=$146,080/$1,170,000=12.49%

                                                 

 

 

 

 

                                 

 

       

You might be interested in
Fifo is preferred when purchase costs are rising and managers have incentives to report higher income for reasons such as bonus
meriva

job security and reputation

A) Ture

5 0
3 years ago
Under the path-goal theory of leadership, what type of leader behavior includes setting challenging goals for the employee with
murzikaleks [220]

In achievement oriented leadership where leader behavior includes setting challenging goals for the employee with the expectation that those goals will be achieved.

What are the leadership behaviors in the path-goal theory of leadership?

The four categories of leadership conduct identified by the path-goal theory are:

  • Achievement-oriented
  • Directive path-goal clarifying
  • Supportive
  • Participative

What must leaders do for their employees according to path-goal theory?

According to the path-goal theory, achievement-oriented leadership conduct involves encouraging subordinates to perform to the best of their ability by establishing high standards, praising excellence, and expressing faith in subordinates' talents.

Learn more about path-goal theory of leadership: brainly.com/question/17018511

#SPJ4

5 0
2 years ago
Simons Company purchased land to build a new factory. The following expenditures were made in conjunction with the land purchase
Alexandra [31]

Answer: attached

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Eric receives a portion of his income from his holdings of interest-bearing U.S. government bonds. The bonds offer a real intere
MArishka [77]

Solution :

Given :

The bonds offer a \text{real interest rate} of 4.5% per year

Tax rate = 10% = 0.10

Inflation rate = 2

\text{Nominal interest rate} = \text{real interest rate} + \text{inflation rate}

\text{Nominal interest rate} = 2 + 4.5

                                   = 6.5

\text{After tax nominal rate} = \text{Nominal interest rate} $\times (1-\text{tax rate})$

\text{After tax nominal interest rate} = $6.5 \times (1-0.10)$

                                                  $=6.5 \times 0.90$

                                                 = 5.85

After tax real interest rate = \text{after tax nominal rate} - \text{inflation rate}

                                           = 5.85 - 2.0

                                            = 3.85

\text{Inflation rate} = 7.0

\text{Real interest rate = 4.5}

\text{Nominal interest rate} = \text{real interest rate} + \text{inflation rate}

                                   = 7 + 4.5

                                  = 11.5

\text{After tax nominal interest rate} = \text{Nominal interest rate} $\times (1-\text{tax rate })$

                                                  $=11.5 \times (1 - 0.10)$

                                                  $=11.5 \times 0.90$

                                                = 10.35

\text{After tax nominal interest rate} = 11.5 x (1 - 0.10)

                                          = 11.5 x 0.90

                                         = 10.35

\text{After tax nominal interest rate} = \text{after tax nominal rate} - \text{inflation rate}

                                           = 10.35 - 7.0

                                          = 3.35

Putting all the value in table :

\text{Inflation rate}    Real interest  Nominal interest  After tax nominal  After tax  

                                  rate                rate               interest rate       interest rate

2.0                             4.5                  6.5                        5.85                   3.85

7.0                              4.5                11.5                         10.35                3.35

Comparing with the \text{higher inflation rate}, a \text{lower inflation rate} will increase the after after tax real interest rate when the government taxes nominal interest income. This tends to encourage saving, thereby increase the quantity of investment in the economy and the increase the economy's long-run growth rate.

7 0
3 years ago
Dream, Inc., has debt outstanding with a face value of $6 million. The value of the firm if it were entirely financed by equity
Deffense [45]

Answer:

$650,000

Explanation:

For computing the decrease in the  expected bankruptcy costs, first we have to determine the total firm value in each case which is shown below:

Total firm value = Equity + Debt × corporate tax rate

                          = $17,850,000 + $6,000,000 × 0.35

                          = $17,850,000 + $2,100,000

                          = $19,950,000

Now the total firm value based on market share

= Equity + Debt

= 350,000 shares × $38 + $6,000,000

= $13,300,000 + $6,000,000

= $19,300,000

The difference would be

= $19,950,000 million - $19,300,000

= $650,000

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How is the current progressive tax system unfair?
    10·1 answer
  • Majority of teenagers in developed nations are seen either browsing the internet or listening to music on their smartphones or o
    11·1 answer
  • Florida schools offered cash bonuses to students who scored high on the state's standardized exams. The cash bonuses are an exam
    15·1 answer
  • A zoo has a circular pool for its seals. The diameter of the pool is 32 feet. How much fence is needed to enclose the pool?
    6·1 answer
  • Identify whether each statement describes the market period, the short run, or the long run.A.Output and the number of firms are
    7·1 answer
  • Discuss the different roles played by the qualitative and quantitative approaches to managerial decision making. Why is it impor
    9·1 answer
  • Three years ago, the City of Recker committed to build a park and music venue by the river. It was expected to cost $2.5 million
    7·1 answer
  • Marie purchases a test to use for customer service representative applicants. The vendor that sells her the test explains that t
    13·1 answer
  • The job outlook suggests that the translator field will likely to continue to grow. Will likely to continue to shrink. Has chang
    10·2 answers
  • If a rise in incomes is the same proportion for both low-income and high-income workers, then poverty will rise and inequality w
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!