Answer:
Brief summary of the case:
The case deals about the evolution of kindle by Company A. When the company decided to introduce kindle, its price was $399 in 2007. Company A understood that to be successful against the huge competitors, kindle must be priced low. It must be highly reliable, many features and elegance must be provided in the design of kindle. "Company A- designed kindle in State C where the research and development expertise is available.
Market research firm "IS," estimated that the manufacturing cost of kindle is about $185. The expensive components of the kindle are the display used in the Electronic ink technology and wireless cord. Company A contracted with Country C's company to produce the display. A manufacturer in Continent A produced a wireless cord of $13. Many components were contracted to the different countries to reduce the cost of the kindle to be competitive. Now, kindle became the competitor to the massive companies.
Determine if the company has decided to manufacture all the components of Electronic reader K in Country U:
If Company had decided to manufacture all the components in Country U, then it would have been more expensive. Company A cannot sell that at an affordable price. Increase in the cost of the components would increase the overall cost of the Electronic reader K. The most important strategy of Company A is to minimize the cost of the product to increase the number of sales.
Increase in the manufacturing cost will dilute their competitive advantage and it increases the cost of the product. It will lower the sales and the buyers would prefer to use the competitors' products, which are cheaper.
Determine if the company has decided to manufacture all the components of Tablet F in Country U:
It would be expensive if they decide to manufacture the components in Country U. It will not affect the sales number like Electronic reader K. as Tablet F is multipurpose. People will prefer quality and specifications than price.
Conclusion:
Manufacturing in Country U would be expensive and it increases the overall cost of the product. It would affect sales of the products.
Answer:
The company should accept Project B because it generates more value per year as compared to Project A.
Explanation:
Explanation can be seen in the file attached.
Its actually <em><u>A) Office Managers and Human Resource workers</u></em>
Answer:
Nominal GDP for year 2010 = $7,650
Explanation:
Nominal GDP measures the market value of all goods and services produced in an economy at current prices, normally in a year. Current prices are the prices of the year I want to know the GDP. In this case, our current prices are 2010 prices. To know the nominal GDP, we must multiply the quantities produced by their current prices:
Nominal GDP= 550*$3+6*$1000=$7,650
Answer:
$20,880
Explanation:
Under the direct method we ignore services that are provided to the other service departments.
In order to allocate the building operation costs to Operating department A, we need to determine what percentage of the building space taken up by Operating departments is used by Operation Department A.
There is a total of 50000 square feet and Operating Department A occupies 60%(30000/50000 of that.
So Operating Department A will get 60% of the building costs
i.e., 60% × 34800 = 20,880
