Based on the results of the study, the conclusion which is valid is There is correlation between the increase in the rate of televised political attack ads since the previous congressional election and the rate of voter dissatisfaction in the observed districts.
<h3>What doe
s the study conclude?</h3>
The study showed that the rate of voter dissatisfaction in the districts since the previous election cycles is similar to the rate of increase of televised political attack ads.
The fact that both the rate of voter dissatisfaction and televised political attack ads moved together means that they correlate with each other.
It is important to note however, that correlation does not equate causation so there might be no link between the two rates.
Find out more on correlation at brainly.com/question/26998752
#SPJ1
so first lets make the denominators the same so that we can divide
1/3 = 2/6
5/6
if you divide johny can make 2 cups of serving and R 1/5
The answer to the question is 9,700.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
The measure of angle a is twice the measure of angle b. This means that
a = 2b
The measure of angle c is at least one degree more than the measure of angle a. This means that
c ≥ a + 1
c ≥ 2b + 1
if the sum of the three angles is at least 61 degrees, it means that
a + b + c = 61 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1
Substituting a = 2b and c = 2b + 1 into equation 1, it becomes
2b + b + 2b + 1 = 61
5b = 61 - 1 = 60
b = 60/5 = 12
c ≥ 2× 12 + 1
c ≥ 25
25 ≥ a + 1
25 - 1 ≥ a
24 ≥ a
a ≤ 24
Therefore, the range possible measurements for angle b is
b ≤ 12
