Answer:
I agree........
Explanation:
<u>I </u><u>agree </u><u>'</u><u>coz </u><u>there </u><u>will </u><u>be </u><u>laughter</u><u>,</u><u> </u><u>interesting </u><u>gists </u><u>more </u><u>friends</u><u>,</u><u> </u><u>and </u><u>helping </u><u>hands</u><u>.</u>
This excerpt shows how Debs has endured and shared the harsh working conditions of laborers (D.).
Many verbal groups indicate his physical involvement in the working people's daily life and how it affected him emotionally:
- "I had ... been stung by the exposure ... of the rail;"
- "I was with the boys ... at the broken engine's side;"
- "helped to bear;"
- "feel the burden."
As for the harsh working conditions, they are described by the following nouns and adjectives:
- "hardship;"
- "weary;"
- "bruised and bleeding bodies;"
- "burden."
We know that they are laborers and not, for example, business owners, because their work is very manual. Besides, the term "working class" appears in the text, as well as "Proletaire" which is borrowed from French and means "belonging to the lower social classes."
Ottomans had to prove that there was no other country of origin other than Egypt and they had blood ties with Egypt.
<u>Explanation:</u>
When there was a denial on the fact that the Ottomans were not Egyptians, they had to prove that they were tru Egyptians and did not have any other blood ties.
For this, the Ottomans had to show the evidence that these people had no other home or place of orgin other than Egypt. More over they had to proof that there was blood ties between Egypt and the Ottomans.
<span>Mughal empire ruled almost the entire indian subcontinent.
</span>
Your question makes no sense....