Answer: $1,203.49
Explanation:
The equal contributions will be an annuity. The $3,500 already there will also grow at 6% for 3 years. Expression is;
8,000 = ( 3,500 * ( 1 + 6%)^3) + Contribution * Future value interest factor of annuity, 3 years, 6%
8,000 = 4,168.56 + Contribution * 3.1836
Contribution = (8,000 - 4,168.56) / 3.1836
Contribution = $1,203.49
Answer:
The correct adjusting journal entry for 12/31/09:
D. debit Spice Expense and credit Spice Inventory 240
Explanation:
Roland Richard purchased 200 ounces off of an expensive spice for $400.
Cost per ounce = $400/200 = $2
By December, 12/31/09, there were 80 ounces on hand. Roland Richard used 120 ounces of expensive spice with the amount of expense: $2 x 120 = $240
The adjusting journal entry for 12/31/09:
Debit Spice Expense $240
Credit Spice Inventory $240
Answer: • management innovation is essential to future organizational success
• we must look at management as a process, and then make improvements and innovation ongoing and systematic
• much of management theory is dated and doesn't fit the current realities of organizational life
Explanation:
The true statements regarding Gary Hamel's thoughts on management are:
1. management innovation is essential to future organizational success
2. we must look at management as a process, and then make improvements and innovation ongoing and systematic
3. much of management theory is dated and doesn't fit the current realities of organizational life
According to Gary Hamel, yesterday's best practices of organizations can not be creative or adaptable for the business challenges tomorrow.
Answer:
The correct answer is $907.76.
Explanation:
According to the scenario, computation of the given data are as follow:-
1¥ = 82.54$
1£ = 132.03¥
Convert pounds to us dollars= £ ÷ $ = £132.03 ÷ $82.54
= 1.60$ ÷ £
Mean, 1£ = 1.6$
She has £567.35 .
After converting the pound into the dollar, she will receive = £567.35 × $1.60
= $907.76
Hence, she receive $907.76 if she sells the pounds.
Answer:
The answer is:
Inelastic
Elastic
Explanation:
Nita’s demand for Coca-Cola will be relatively more inelastic i.e his demand will not be sensitive to price. Increasing the price of Coca-cola will not make Nita to change its taste because he is a devoted Coca-Cola consumer.
Becky’s demand will be relatively more elastic because he has an option to choose between Pepsi and Coca-cola.
Any increase in price of Coca-cola will make Becky to shift to Pepsi.
