An electronic communication that is usually written by a single author and devoted to a single subject is option C) “Internet weblogs”. Weblogs are posts or entries published on the internet. They are told by a single person and cover one topic.
Option A is incorrect since radio broadcasts are radio waves transmissions targeted to wide audiences, they can be transmitted by several people simultaneously in a radio program and during this program several topics can be discussed, usually with the active participation of the audience.
Option B is also incorrect as a TV show usually has many participants and several topics are discussed.
And finally option D is also incorrect since magazines usually cover several topics in their articles and these articles are written by different authors.
Answer:
- The promotion of natural rights and the sovereignty of the people in politics (the social contract).
Explanation:
The Enlightenment philosophes championed the Scientific Revolution's approach to knowledge, emphasizing the use of reason in all matters, in contrast to following superstition or unquestioningly accepting traditional beliefs.
The Scientific Revolution showed that there are natural laws in place in the physical world and in the universe at large. Applying similar principles to matters like government and society, Enlightenment thinkers believed that using reason will guide us to the best ways to operate politically so we can create the most beneficial conditions for society. For many Enlightenment thinkers, this included a conviction that all human beings have certain natural rights which are to be protected and preserved. This led to changes of approach to how society should be governed -- moving away from ideas like the "divine right of kings" to the establishment of more democratic, constitutional societies. This was the concept of the "social contract," that governments get their authority to govern from the consent of the governed.
The Atlanta campaigns and the Savannah campaign
The answer is, To argue for, there's the obvious, which is that the colonists didn't
like their lack of voice within British Parliament. They also didn't
like how Britain was treating other colonies, what would become Canada
for instance, with similar laws and codes seen in the US colonies. You
could also argue that it was a more financial decision, as the taxes
placed upon the colonies and the restrictions on trade were hurting
American businesses. Honestly, an argument combining the two would
probably be more rounded.
