Answer:
m<L, m<K, m<J
Step-by-step explanation:
The angle that sees the longest side length has the biggest measurement
so
for listing the angles from smallest to largest
m<L, m<K, m<J
To do this question I recommend dividing each number by the lowest prime number you can each time.
36/2=18
18/2=9
9/3=3
Since 3 is prime we stop there. The prime factors of 36 are therefore 2,2,3, and 3. I would write this as 36=2^2x3^2
22 is simpler as it is just 2x11
not so sure
Step-by-step explanation:
all you need to do is look up on Google what is the cost of an 8000 car including 57% tax and you might have to put 57% into decimal
Based on the amount of federal taxes withheld till date, the percent of Mary Brown's year-to-date that have been withheld is A. 10%.
The percent of the gross pay that has been withheld for all taxes and voluntary dues is C. 17%.
<h3>How much federal taxes have been withheld?</h3>
= Fed tax till date / YTD Gross
= 662.26 / 6,318.17
= 10%
<h3>How much taxes and voluntary dues have been withheld?</h3><h3 />
= (Fed tax + ST Tax + Med tax + Vol Due) / Current gross
= (111.42 + 17.09 + 12.25 + 2.5) / 845.10
= 17%
Find out more on gross earnings and deductions at brainly.com/question/24278391.
#SPJ1
No. Terrell is not correct. Terrell is incorrect. The method he offers is
inappropriate, inapplicable, and lacks veracity, and as a mathematician,
Terrell himself is devoid of integrity. If his method is implemented, it
cannot accurately compute the capacity of Dominic's water jug in fluid
ounces. It will produce a number that is inaccurate, fallacious, mistaken,
erroneous, and incorrect. Moreover, the solution will be wrong.
If the units are carried through with the calculation ... as always they must ...
then it will immediately become clear that Terrell's method has produced a
solution with units of "square quarts per ounce", whereupon any witnesses
should justifiably become nauseous. Terrell's method should be disdained,
rejected, discarded and ignored.
==> 1.25 should not be "divided" by 32.
==> Instead, 1.25 should be<span> multiplied </span>by 32.
The modified method will produce a result with units of "fluid ounces" ...
the first indication to the assembled multitude that whatever the number
is, there is a reasonable chance that it could be a correct one.
