Answer:
No, the costs are too high
Explanation:
The phrase Civil disobedience, disobedience means lack of respect for the rule of law, however, the word civil means this actions by citizens is peaceful or undertaken without violence. Therefore, this can be termed as citizens embarking in a non-violent protest in other to make or request a lingering demand from its government, show their displeasure towards a certain policy or action with which the citizens demands a responsible response from thier government. All these are to be conducted in a peaceful, non, violent manner in other to be termed civil. However, often times we've seen protests starting out as civil and turned bloody, on the leading to destruction of properties and irreplaceable losses in lives of citizens. These costs are too high just for the government to hear our plea, a more effective means will be the creation of a government - citizen dialogue channel which would annual losses during protests in the name of calling for cahgws or making ourselves heard.
Answer:
There was no record seen by Wilmot, to show that Shakespeare read a book, let alone write a letter.
Explanation:
James Wilmot, a reverend and literary scholar came up with an idea in 1781 that Shakespeare was not Shakespeare. He went to the house that William Shakespeare lived during his lifetime, and went through all the libraries in his Stratford residence and searched for correspondence.
There was no record seen by Wilmot, to show that Shakespeare read a book, let alone write a letter. He did not find Shakespeare signatures on the bottom of the old letters that were seen. He also stated that there was no property, belonging to Shakespeare, that was written on the on the endpapers of a Bible.
James Wilmot concluded that the plays of Shakespeare could not have been written by someone who did not leave an literary paper trail behind him.
The answer is D. Hope this helps :)
Answer: Whats the question exactly?
Explanation:
