Answer:
d. The Spanish explorers brought disease to the Native Americans
Explanation:
they brought diseases like chicken pox, influenza, measles, and smallpox. these were all deadly to Native Americans
The answer is that Zebulon Pike, the U.S. Army officer who in 1805 led an exploring party in search of the source of the Mississippi River, sets off with a new expedition to explore the American Southwest. Pike was instructed to seek out headwaters of the Arkansas and Red rivers and to investigate Spanish settlements in New Mexico. Pike and his men left Missouri and passed through the present day states of Kansas and Nebraska before reaching Colorado, where he spotted the famous mountains later named in his honor. From there, they traveled down to New Mexico, where they were stopped by Spanish officials and charged with illegal entry into Spanish- held territory. His party was escorted to Santa Fe, then down to Chihuahua, back up through Texas, and finally to the border of the Louisiana Territory, where they were released. Soon after returning to the east, Pike was implicated in a plot with former Vice President Aaron Burr to seize territory in the Southwest for mysterious ends. However, after an investigation, Secretary of State James Madison fully exonerated him. The information he provided about the U.S. territory in Kansas and Colorado was a great impetus for future U.S. settlement, and his reports about the weakness of Spanish authority in the Southwest stirred talk of the future U.S. annexation.
Answer:
gjeorigjeroijeorjgoerjgeoirjgijgeoirjgeoirjgoeirjgoriejgeoirgjoeirjgoierjgoeirjgoeirgjerogjeji
Explanation:
jigoreigjerigjioergjeroijgeoirjgeoirjgeoijgeorijgeorigjeriogjeroijgifjwiefjweoifjofewijwioefjwoeijfwoifjwoeijfewoijfweiojfweiojfwoiefjieowfwieojfweoifjwieojfwoiejfoweijfoewijfweoijfowiejfwoiefjwoiejfwoeijfowiejfjiwfjifjifweijfewjiofewijowejiwefjiowjiefefjoiwewfjioewfjoiewijofijowefefjijfioejoewfiojfweioijewfjoiefwijojoiefwjioefwijowefjoiewfiojwefjoifwejoijioojijoiiojijofewoefwewifijefwojiewfoijewjioejwfiowjfoeijfwoiefjwoeifjwoiejfwoiefjwoiejfwoeifjweoijfwoeifjwoiejfowiejfwoiejfowiejfwoiefjwoeijfwoiefjoiwefjoiwjfowiefjewofjewoifjio
Th two holiest cities of Islam are .......
A) Mecca and Medina
In order to paraphrase a text you should understand each paragraph's main ideas and then think of other citations and examples of your own to complete the logic of it.
1 - The Beard interpretation has two main problems: first, there isn’t in the Constitution any confession or strong sign of the influence from those who believed the fundamental private rights of property being fundamentally anterior to government and morally unreachable for the popular majorities; second, it is impossible to deny the Constitution as a document in federalism.
2 - These problems should be addressed. The second is simple for it is consensual amongst Revolutionary era historians that the big question of that moment was: how to articulate diverse parts of an empire towards common purposes? And how to realize that articulation without taking one side more than another, without transforming demands for liberty and autonomy into central government undermining. It can be argued that’s the same debate over Federal aid to education.
3 - The Declaratory Act was a declaration of the British failure in solving this same problem, about which Edmund Burke sharply observed the impossibility of arguing anyone into slavery. When it was time for Americans to deal with this dilemma the Articles of Confederation were adequate when discussing the distribution of powers but lacking in sanctions. This deficiency was the cause of the Philadelphia Convention.
4 - Although Beard’s interpretation is convincing when arguing that those who wrote the Constitution belonged to the propertied classes, he is not as convincing about this being reflected on the Constitution itself. If the framers were trying to protect their property they didn’t succeed. Our analysis of the Economic Interpretation of the Constitution shows that the auteur’s reading of that historical moment fails to legitimate itself when confronted with the Constitution’s text. What each of the framers did after the Constitution and how it was directly linked to his class isn’t enough proof of the auteur’s argument if it isn’t shown also through the Constitution.
