a. The self-driving vehicle industry is changing too much for the top-down approach to be effective.
b. The top-down approach can only be applied to specific business functions.
c. The top-down approach leaves other employees uncertain about their roles in the company.
d. The top-down approach is expensive to maintain, leaving the company at a competitive disadvantage.
Answer:
a. The self-driving vehicle industry is changing too much for the top-down approach to be effective.
Explanation:
The top-down approach is a model in which there is a hierarchical style and the decisions are made by the manager and then informed down the organizational chart and the lower levels have to accept the decisions. In this approach, people in the lower levels have low participation and influence on the decisions and as the firm's industry is changing too much, this people would posses crucial information and specialized knowledge that the top level might not have and because of that, this approach might not be effective. According to that, the answer is that this scenario is wrong because the self-driving vehicle industry is changing too much for the top-down approach to be effective.
Answer:
EOQ= 300 units
Annual ordering cost= $3750
Annual holding cost =$3750
Re-order point =100 units
Explanation:
The Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) is the order size that minimizes the balance of ordering cost and holding cost. At the EOQ, the carrying cost is equal to the holding cost.
It is computed using he formulae below
EOQ = √ (2× Co× D)/Ch
EOQ = √ (2× 75× 15,000)/25
EOQ = 300 units
Annual holding cost
= EOQ/2 × holding cost per unit
= 300/2 × $25
=$3750
Annual ordering cost
= Annul demand/EOQ × ordering cost per order
=( 15,000/300)× $75
= $3750
Re-order Point
Maximum consumption × maximum lead time
=( 15,000/300)× 2 = 100 units
Answer:
0.079
Explanation:
Price elasticity of demand using midpoint formula can be calculated as follows
Formula
Elasticity of demand = (change in quantity/average quantity)/(change in price/average price)
Calculation
Elasticity of demand = (600/10,900)/(-2.1/3.05)
Elasticity of demand =-0.055 / -0.688
Elasticity of demand =-0.079
working
Change in price (2-4.1) = -2.1
Average price (2+4.1)/2=3.05
Change in quantity (11,200-10600) = 600
average quantity (11,200+10,600)/2 = 10,900
The elasticity of demand is inelastic as the elasticity is below 1.
Answer:
The answer is:
The Kincaids can sue David and Sandra Dess because they can be considered intended beneficiaries of the contract between them and Sirva.
Explanation:
Intended beneficiaries are third parties in a contract that can sue the promisor for breach of contract.
In the contract, David and Sandra agreed to fully disclose all information about the property. Under the terms of the contract, they agreed that Sirva and "other prospective buyers" could rely on their disclosures.
Hello <span>Gabbypittman20!
Answer:This answer is very tricky...but at least you have a teacher to help you.
</span><span>The answer to this question would
buy new clothes before buying a computer. Explanation:
See, this is a Need or want question. You NEED clothes but you WANT a computer. Get it? contact me for more information.
FLVS teacher,
~Sarah Bunkly
</span>
