Answer:
Probably not, because Alyssa made a mistake about the dog's value, not a mistake about material fact.
Explanation:
When Sierra offered to sell the dog to Allysa, Allysa failed to discuss the ancestry of the puppy. She wrongly believed the dog came from a line of champions.
On finding out the dog is only worth $200, she will not be able to rescind the contract because the onus to ask all relevant questions about the purchase before accepting is on her.
She made the mistake of assuming the dog was worth $800. She made a mistake about the dog's value and not the material fact.
ok whts the fight abt? how long have yall been fighting?
i gotchu
Answer:
The reason is that the Pauline's parents are performing parental orders which includes the imposition of conditions. These imposed conditions and rules for the children are for their benefit and will help them in forming habits and protect themselves from the world evil beings. All the habits structuring of Pauline which her parent desire are of immense importance for her future life. Neither of the condition or rule mentioned in the case are unethical and are what a proactive person possesses and are also desirable. This shows that the parents are working hard with their children to let them have a good set of habits and reflects good parenting. Though initiallt it seems that the liberty of Pauline is diminished but will ensure its future safety and liberty in the long run. People have choice to drink wine but this doesn't mean that the childrem must also taste them. This is because its not good for health and that the lack of good parenting will affect them most.
