Drilling for fossil fuels.
This is because the main fossil fuels are not typically found in the rainforest. To also back up this claim, use the process of elimination.
The last choice, demand for rainforest products, is obviously incorrect as that would mean expansion into the rainforest to gather said products.
Shortage of food sources wouldn't be the correct answer either as food sources aren't typically found in the rainforest among popular demand and food can be shipped into the country as well.
Overcrowding in cities would also lead to expansion, where to can differ based on location but to rainforests or anywhere surrounding the area would be preferred or desirable.
Hope this helps!
I world say national park. because farming could be taking away from the biodiversity. where as the national park planning would be trying to help the biodiversity.
Answer:
The relative frequency of the mutation will increase as time passes.
Explanation:
This random mutation has, by chance, caused a phenotype that is beneficial to the bacteria. This mutation improves the fitness of the bacteria, as they are able to utilize more food sources. This reduces the chance of starvation and death of the cell. Therefore, cells with this mutation are more likely to survive, and for longer.
In times where nutrients are scarce, bacteria without the population will die off. But the bacteria with this mutation will be more likely to survive and pass on their genetic material. Therefore, over time, the frequency of this mutation will increase.
It’s true. Stems are organs that hold the trees and plants up and also produces the leaves and secondary stems
what's the question?I am confused is that the question or a statement
