The correct answer is 100%
This is because Back and white are both incomplete dominant traits. When you cross these together, all (100%) of the offspring will be heterozygous blue.
I just took the test on USATestPrep, so I guarantee you that is correct!
Have a great day! :)
 
        
             
        
        
        
RNA and DNA-RNA hybrids are more dense than simply DNA if the density of different nucleic acids is tested using a CsCl gradient. 
The primary technique employed in molecular biology is the extraction of DNA, RNA, and protein. Scientists can separate materials according to size, shape, and density by using density gradient centrifugation. Isopycnic centrifugation, a sort of density gradient centrifugation that Meselson and Stahl developed, employed a cesium chloride solution to separate DNA molecules solely on the basis of density. Because DNA has hydrogen bonds between its strands, which makes it less dense than RNA, RNA has a far larger density than DNA. RNA can be obtained at the test tube's bottom using a CsCl density gradient and high centrifugation, whereas DNA can be recovered in the middle layer.
To learn more about nucleic acids click here brainly.com/question/11309892
#SPJ4
 
        
             
        
        
        
The correct answer is:
A. Will have a intermediate trait 3. Glucose aversion is a genetically-determined incompletely dominant trait
B. Will refuse glucose 2. Glucose aversion is a genetically-determined dominant trait
C. Have a mix of traits depending on experience 4. Glucose aversion is a learned behavior
D. Will accept glucose 1. Glucose aversion is a genetically-determined recessive trait
If we put it simple and say that for example glucose aversion is genetically determinated, with the genotype AA and eating glucose with the genotype aa. The offspring will have Aa genotype (heterozygous). Depending on which phenotype is expressed in heterozygous we can conclude whether the trait is dominant or recessive or due to earned behavior.
 
        
                    
             
        
        
        
Answer:
Any insect unlucky enough to land on the mouth-like leaves of an Australian pitcher plant will meet a grisly end. The plant's prey is drawn into a vessel-like ‘pitcher’ organ where a specialized cocktail of enzymes digests the victim.
Now, by studying the pitcher plant's genome—and comparing its insect-eating fluids to those of other carnivorous plants—researchers have found that meat-eating plants the world over have hit on the same deadly molecular recipe, even though they are separated by millions of years of evolution.