<span> Judith Miller was a reporter for the New York
Times who wrote an article claiming that Iraq has nukes. The government used
Miller’s article to justify going to “war” (not really a war when it’s just one
side killing another). She claimed that Iraq is going to use the nuclear
weapons to hurt the American people, which made people, and rightfully so, fear
for their safety. After the US started the war (and got all the oil they
needed), they revealed that Iraq had no nuclear weapons, after all. The reporter, Judith Miller was put in jail
for a short while afterwards for not revealing her sources when she published the article; today, she is blamed by many people
to be part of the cause of the Iraq war.</span>
<span>
</span>
<span> People are continuously suggesting that the US finally leaves Iraq today, however that has not yet happened. A lot of people are in favor of the US leaving Iraq because enough is enough and the war going on there hasn't been doing anyone any good. The US has been losing a lot of money on the military spending and there has been a lot of loss of life on the Iraqi side, so it's not benefiting any side. Other people that oppose the US leaving Iraq mostly do it privately because they want to continue stealing Iraqi oil or because they genuinely believe that Iraq is still a threat. </span>
The answer is: helping draft the Seneca Falls Declaration of Sentiments.
The declaration of sentiments bring the attention to unfairness that female citizens experienced in 1840s.
At that time, discrimination on women's treatment in work place and political field was being done openly, and the law did nothing to protect them. This declaration lead to the birth of women's suffrage movement, which eventually able to give the women with the rights to vote in 1920s.
Because of its subordinate position in a capitalist society and the effects of periodic depression on wages and employment, the proletariat, as described by Marxists, was usually living in poverty.
I'm pretty sure that it is (Germany) :)
Ty's mother has an <u>Permissive</u> type of parenting style.
Permissive parenting refers to a type of parenting style which is portrayed by low demands with high responsiveness. Permissive parents have a tendency to be extremely cherishing, yet give couple of rules and standards. These parents don't expect develop conduct from their youngsters and regularly appear to be more similar to a companion than a parental figure.
These parents have a tendency to be the total inverse of the alleged "helicopter guardians." Instead of floating over their kids' each move, lenient guardians are fantastically careless and once in a while make or uphold any kind of standards or structure. Their adage is frequently essentially that "kids will be kids." While they are typically warm and cherishing, they make practically no endeavor to control or teach their children.
