1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
gavmur [86]
3 years ago
8

What is utterson obsession​

English
1 answer:
kompoz [17]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Utterson's obsession stemmed from his imagination.... picturing "juggernaut" as he walked across the street..... he was still thinking about the danger Hyde might have towards his friend.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Can justice and forgiveness go hand in hand?
Arlecino [84]
This is a rather subjective question, and it really depends on your personal opinions about the topic. In my eyes, yes, justice and forgiveness can go hand in hand. Let's take an example of an offender who committed a particular crime.

He or she will be prosecuted for what they did, and thus justice will be served. However, after they've endured their punishment, they might become law-abiding citizens again, and this is where forgiveness takes place - they can be forgiven for their evil deeds and allowed back into the society (although, this depends on the crime they've committed). 
7 0
3 years ago
Quindlen begins by disagreeing with a fellow writer. How and how fairly does she represent the opposing point of view?
Oksi-84 [34.3K]

Answer:Quindlen was criticizing the application of standardized testing (perhaps in the wake of the controversial "No Child Left Behind" act which some say placed too much emphasis on standardized testing). Quindlen's argument is that if standardized testing is to be used, it should at least be interesting and more importantly, such testing should not edit works of literature to the point at which significant meaning is lost. Actually, she is arguing that literature should not be edited at all.  

Quindlen doesn't think children are too feeble and weak to read controversial issues because they are exposed to such issues through the media and Internet every day. In fact, by sanitizing (editing out anything remotely controversial) literature, the test will not challenge the student.  

Those who design the test claim that anything controversial might distract the student and affect his/her performance. Quindlen's response is that the kids can handle it and more to the point, if all remotely controversial issues are edited out, what is left can hardly been interesting or engaging. Also, to edit in this way is historically irresponsible. Quindlen notes that in Isaac Singer's excerpt about being a young Jew in prewar (World War II) Poland, all references to Jews and Poles were taken out.  

Quindlen notes that there are other consequences of this editing. One is that the students will determine from this that those designing the test have no faith in their (the students') ability to handle differing perspectives and challenging intellectual material. Quindlen argues that this is sending the message to children that "we don't think you're smart enough."  

But what do the kids learn from this? That the written word doesn't really matter much, that it can be weakened at will. That no one trusts a student to understand that variations in opinion and background are both objectively interesting and intellectually challenging.  

This also tells the student that there is no power to the written word (as literature, laws, etc.) if we can simply edit things that don't appeal to a particular way of thinking. So, clearly Quindlen is against this manipulation of literature, in these tests and in general, for a number of reasons, all logical. This kind of editing also sets a dangerous precedent where those in power of educating children have the ability to subject students to a particular worldview that they only assume is the best for everyone. This is quite audacious and ignores one of the hallmarks of American culture: diversity.

Explanation:

hope you get your thing correct

4 0
3 years ago
What word is related to bother, Disturb , worry (number two and 5)?
morpeh [17]
2. disrupt, upset.
5. mutter, stutter.
8 0
3 years ago
Who here read Johnny Tremilen? Need help on him!!! Extra points!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Tcecarenko [31]
How can i help you? i would like to
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Each person, regardless of age or backgrounds, have the right to krump. How should the sentence above be rewritten to correct th
Gnesinka [82]
<span>The correct answer is "Each person, regardless of age or backgrounds, has the right to krump." 'Has' is a third person singular form of the verb 'have.' This means that it will be used in a sentence where the subject is another person (not yourself.) In this case, the subject is "person," which is singular and not yourself. What if the subject of this sentence was "people" instead of person? We would use "have" because the subject is now plural!</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Scout tells us, "Aunt Alexandra fitted into the world of Maycomb like a hand into a glove, but never into the world of Jem and m
    10·1 answer
  • Which line from the text shows the problem with the first matches? (50 points)​
    14·1 answer
  • JUST READ MY 2 PARAGRAPHS AND GIVE FEEDBACK. ALL I NEED IS PROOFREADING.
    5·2 answers
  • Which of the words in the following sentence can be eliminated without changing the meaning? the construction project downtown w
    5·2 answers
  • How do friday and crusoe defeat 21 cannibals?
    8·1 answer
  • What is the central idea of this excerpt?
    9·1 answer
  • How is talking about vaccines going to help us find a cure for cancer?
    6·1 answer
  • Select the correct answer
    7·2 answers
  • Read this text, which Rhonda is planning to use in an argumentative essay in favor of pet ownership.
    12·1 answer
  • Which sentence is in active voice? ​
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!