Answer:
no it's not
Step-by-step explanation:
6(2r+(-1)+1 = 12r + -6 + 6 = 12r+ 0 => not equivalent to 12r - 5
Hope this help :)
Answer:
Are you on I X L?
Step-by-step explanation:
I apoligize but try googling 5% of 50
Martha's total earnings is the sum of her fixed pay pay day and the extra she gains based on the number of toys she sold. Her total earnings may be expressed as,
44 + 2n
Since she desires to earn $80 or more, the inequality is expressed as
44 + 2n ≥ 80
Solving for n from the inequality,
n ≥18
Thus, the answer is the first choice.
1) move the 10 over to the other side which would give you 28.
2) divide by 4 to get x by itself.
ANSWER: 7
