The correct answer to this question is $1250. To prove this, an image is attached together with this answer.
<span>The 2016 repayment limitation for a single taxpayer who has income at a 350% poverty level is $1250. Based on the image, it shows that at the line of
at least 300% but less than 400%, the repayment limit of single tax payer is $1250.</span>
Answer:
Explanation:
There are a variety of sub categories/goals that you will learn in business writing class and they are the following
- Learning to effectively write emails, letters, memos, reports.
- Learning to logically, efficiently, and effectively organize your gathered information and ideas.
- Learning how to correctly identify and choose the appropriate communication strategy, format, style, and content for the specific scenario.
- Learning to correctly identify any and all grammatical and punctuation problems within your writing.
Answer:
dividends payout ratio = total dividends / net income
- dividends payout ratio 2016 = $630 / $685 = 0.9197 = 91.97%
- dividends payout ratio 2017 = $335 / $605 = 0.5537 = 55.37%
return on equity = (net income - preferred dividends) / average equity
- return on equity 2016 = ($685 - $45) / $2,925 = 0.2188 = 21.88%
- return on equity 2017 = ($605 - $45) / $2,825 = 0.1982 = 19.82%
Answer:
Purchase of 300
Explanation:
Given,
Money Supply is 2,500
Bank's deposit ratio is 0.20
Bank reserve is 200
Currency held by public is 500
Increase in the money supply is 3,000
Bank Deposit (BD) = Bank reserve / Bank's deposit ratio
= 200 / 0.20
= 1,000
Money Supply = Bank Deposit + Currency held by public
= 1,000 + 500
= 1,500
Purchase of 300
Then New BD = 500 / 0.20
= 2,500
New Money supply = 2,500 + 500
= 3,000
So, in order to increase the money supply to 3,000, should conduct the open market purchase of 300 bonds.
Answer:
If Amy sues X Corp. because of the pay differential, what must she show?
The Equal Pay Act of 1963 prohibits discrimination in payment on the basis of gender (and race and origin also). In this case, Amy must prove that her work requires the same skills as Luis's and that it provides the same value to the company. They both have a master's degree in computer science, but she must also show that Luis's Ph.D. is not important to their work.
What might the company argue in defense?
The company might argue two things:
- That Luis has a higher education degree, since he has a Ph.D.
- That Luis's work is more specialized since he codes games, while Amy codes different projects. They would have to prove that the games that Luis codes are much more profitable and valuable to the company than the work Amy does.
Who should win?
If their work is similar, then Amy should win. If they are basically both doing the same job and require the same skills, therefore, the salary should be the same.
But if Luis's work is much more relevant and profitable for the company, then Amy would lose. If this is true, they might have to change Luis's compensation and reduce his salary but increase bonus compensation. This is true in all companies (or the vast majority of), e.g. the quarterback receives the highest salary since his job is more important for the team.
