<span>I would say A
though i got a little confused at first but i hope i helped
</span>
C) But even this is admitting more than is true, for I answer roundly, that America would have flourished as much, and probably much more, had no European power had anything to do with her. thus option C is correct.
<h3>Why British rule of American colonies?</h3>
Although each colony had its own government, the British king maintained power over them. Many colonists were irate by the 1770s because they lacked self-government. This implied that they were unable to rule themselves and establish their own rules. The king demanded that they pay enormous taxes.
According to Paine's claim in Option C, America would have actually been better off if it had not been under British rule. According to him, America's progress and ability to prosper even more were really hampered by its rule by the British. Both options A and B make the case that America needs Britain to succeed. Option A claims that for America to be happy, a relationship with Britain is crucial. America is compared to a child in Option B. According to this, a child should never consume meat if they can get by on milk alone. America should therefore just require Britain. Although Paine evidently finds this absurd, the premise does not support the claim.
Learn more about British rule here:
brainly.com/question/3203295
#SPJ1
Answer:
The correct option is identical.
Explanation:
A modifier refers to a word, phrase, or clause which can work either as an adjective or as an adverb whose main function is to provide a description. These modifiers have comparative and superlative forms that are used to compare two things.
Such comparison is commonly defined as the act of evaluating two or more things (person, place, thing or even an idea) in order to determine if such ideas are similar or different.
Bearing in mind the described above, it could be said that<em> the word </em><em>identical </em><em>could be used as a modifier to make a comparison.</em>
<span>The correct answer is A. This description applies to Beowulf.
At this point in the poem, Beowulf is about to battle Grendel. Because Grendel is charmed such that no human weapon can harm him, Beowulf must do away with "weapons of victory," such as swords. Beowulf goes down to battle Grendel without taking any weapons with him.
Once there, however, he finds the sword forged by giants, which he uses to slay Grendel. Because this sword was not made by human hands, it can be used to kill Grendel.</span>