Based on the phrases, this is the correct order of how David was able to teach English in Spain.
.
A. David took some elective courses in creative writing and linguistics while he was in high school
<span>B. David put in four hours of study each day to earn straight As throughout high school. </span>
C. David received his Bachelor of Arts degree in education with a minor in Spanish.
<span> D. </span><span>David completed his Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL) Master's program</span>
<span>E .David applied for a teaching program that allowed him to teach English to Spanish speakers in the United States</span>.
F. David was selected for a teaching program in his school and was sent to teach English in Spain.
I think David had a background about English when he was in High school. He was able to practice it by writing. Both A and B happened in his high school years, that is why they are ranked a and b. Then the rest would most probably happen after high school
<span> </span>
It tells us how she chooses her place in society over greiving the death of a loved one
First, it's associated sometimes with highly contentious theories, such as Holocaust denial. Recall the public furor in response to Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's 2007 speech at Columbia University, when he stated that the Holocaust didn't happen. Historians emphasize that people who deny the events of the Holocaust during World War II aren't practicing revisionist history but rather negationism. Another revisionism-related scandal occurred recently in Japan, also concerning World War II. The general of the Japanese air force authored an essay asserting that Japan was bullied into Pearl Harbor by the United States and only engaged in combat as a defensive measure. This brings up the issue of credibility that has marred the field of historical revisionism. The public tends to view revisionist theories of well-known historical incidents tied closely to its own lineage with more skepticism than those regarding more obscure events.
In the end, only a small quantity of revisionists histories are eventually accepted as fact.
Answer:
Oedipus is intensely angry when he kills his biological father and when he fights with Creon and Teiresias for giving him bad news.
Explanation:
Oedipus has difficulties in controlling his emotions, especially anger. That's because he is a person with an explosive temperament, who can't handle solving intrigues with ease and who expresses himself with violence. This personality trait not only leaves Oedipus a very intense character, but also leaves him a real person who often does not act rationally, being totally controlled by anger, leaving his story totally unpredictable.
Oedipus' anger may be exaggerated for us, but it was a common feature for the Greek society that created this play. That's because the Greeks at that time lived in a very violent time with several invasions and stress. Watching a character unleash his anger in a grandiose way could be somewhat comfortable for the Greeks.
Answer:
Stockton's concept of love was a bit different than what others have in the stories written by him, he is seemed to bring out love with jealousy from the characters of his story. This is unique and different idea and he is the only one to write stories like this defining love with a different angle as no one has seen before.
Explanation:
Stockton's concept of love was a bit different than what others have in the stories written by him, he is seemed to bring out love with jealousy from the characters of his story. This is unique and different idea and he is the only one to write stories like this defining love with a different angle as no one has seen before.
