The question above is incomplete, the complete version is given below:
Read this excerpt from
"Not a Dove, But No Longer a Hawk."
I wonder, when I look at the
bombed out peasant hamlets, the orphans begging and stealing on the streets of
Saigon and the women and children with napalm burns lying on the hospital cots,
whether the United States or any nation has the right to inflict this suffering
and degradation on another people for its own ends.<span>
How do the allusions in this excerpt reinforce the meaning of the passage?</span>
The allusions clarify the geographic locations visited by the
author.
The allusions recall specific locations and horrors of the
Vietnam conflict.
The allusions question the Vietnamese for allowing such a
violent war.
<span>The allusions criticize the political philosophies that
encourage suffering.</span>
<span>ANSWER</span>
The correct option is this: THE ALLUSION CRITICIZE THE POLITICAL PHILOSOPHIES THAT ENCOURAGE SUFFERING. Allusion is a figure of speech, which refers to an object or a circumstance from an external context. In the passage given above, the author is questioning the political morality behind war. War usually result in great suffering for all involved and the author is wondering, if is morally correct for countries to be settling their differences by mean of warfare.
Answer:
how much money do you get?
do you get gold diamonds or cash?
how do they get that cash to give to you?
Explanation:
There’s no answers here? I don’t any
I believe you should should eliminate cash because although it comes in handy when paying small items, such as gum or candy, it is easy to lose considering the are paper bills, they take too much time to count individually, and because it is used a lot in the black market, since it is not easy to trace (if we eliminated cash, black market buyers would be easier to trace). Hope this helps! Please mark brainliest! Thank you v much! :)
C. It shows the reader the focus of the whole piece.
