Answer:
The correct answer is <em>d. Both governmental and nongovernmental are acceptable organizational forms.</em>
Explanation:
Not-for-profit organizations can take both <u>governmental </u>and <u>nongovernmental</u>, meaning that they can be established by the government in the first case, or independently from government - in the second. They can also take a hybrid form, in which an organisation is non governmental by definition, but has ties with government. For example, the National Democratic Institute (NDI), which is loosely affiliated with the Democratic Party.
Not-for-profit organizations <u>can never take the form of a business</u> because they operate not for profit. It means that they can not generate any income which would qualify as profit. In the case they do generate income, like a charitable organisation, it all has to be donated.
Answer:
D: St.Lawrence River
E: The canadian shield
Explanation:
The Thames River is located in london so that immediately removes it as a possibility. Second the Atacama Desert is in Chile and since you said North America that would technically make it wrong even though it's in "America". The Andes are a large collection of mountains that run alon the eastern coast of south america making them not in North America. The St. Lawrence River is a river in North America, it's a large river that runs along most of canada and runs through many big cities. The Canadian Shield is sorta an obvoious answer but some would think it's missleading, but it's a large formation of exposed igneous and metamorphic rock located in canada.
Three(3) persuasive appeals I have heard this week are :
- Go get your PVC and vote
- Learn a new skill while on holidays
- Buy two products get one free
<h3>Examples of persuasive appeals </h3>
<u>Go get your PVC and vote</u> was a persuasive appeal made by our local politician which was aimed at getting electorates to get prepared for the for coming elections and I think the appeal was necessary and I was able to go get registered to acquire my PVC since I did not have one.
<u>Learn a new skill while on holidays</u> was aimed at encouraging senior high school and college level students to engage in learning a new soft or technical skill to increase their employability status after graduation Which I believe was persuasive enough. I didn't not act because I was not on holidays yet.
When you <u>buy some products and get a free gift</u> it is an encouragement for he customer to continue patronizing the store/business therefore I find is persuasive enough and I will visit the store soon enough.
Hence we can conclude that your answers are as listed above
Learn more about persuasive appeals : brainly.com/question/10271704
#SPJ1
Answer:
conditioned stimulus
Explanation:
In this specific experiment, the ringing of the bell was the conditioned stimulus. This term refers to a previously neutral stimulus that has become associated with the unconditioned stimulus which ultimately triggers a conditioned response. In this experiment, the ringing of the bell (conditioned stimulus) has been associated with the meat (unconditioned stimulus) in order to cause the dogs to salivate when the bell rings (conditioned response).
no because even though they are supreme courts doesnt mean they will always be correct
