The state could not gather together a militia due to a lack of funds to suppress Shay's rebellion.
Shays rebellion- It was a series of armed revolts against the government of Massachusetts in the city of Springfield. The farmer of Springfield led the revolt against the excessive tax collection by the officials. Daniel shays were the leader of the revolt.
The initial goal of the rebellion was to reform the government policy on tax but later they wanted to overthrow the government.
The federation's government was unable to gather the militia to put down the rebellion due to a lack of financial resources at its disposal. However, the revolt was later put down by the privately funded armies and the government of the state of Massachusetts.
Disclaimer- The question is incomplete and the correct question maybe this-
Which statement is TRUE about Shays' Rebellion?
A. The federal government could not intervene in the rebellion in order to stop it (not allowed).
B. The state could not create a militia to help under the rules of the Articles.
C. The state government could not intervene to stop it (not allowed)
D. The militia from a different nation had to end the rebellion under the rules of the Articles.
To learn more about the shays rebellion please click on the link brainly.com/question/894949
#SPJ1
<span>Answer:
They really don't. the president can still exercise those powers despite their ratings. They may be swayed from doing so, but in the end, it doesn't affect their ability.</span>
They'll go down. When businesses are in competition, the prices usually go up and the product/service quality increases.
Answer:
it provides unbiased views and resolution to evidence presented in a case in a court of law. If jury duty was not mandatory there would be no jurors or at-most very few.
