Answer:
$163,100
Explanation:
First find the present value of cashflows at year 1 and 2
<u>PV of $82,400;</u>
PV = FV/(1+r)^n
PV = 82,400/(1.1275)^1
PV = $73082.0399
<u>PV of $148,600;</u>
PV = FV/(1+r)^n
PV = 148,600 /(1.1275)^2
PV = $116,892.2473
From the cumulative present value of 303,764.34, find the balance after deducting the above PVs;
PV of cashflow yr3 = $303,764.34 -$73082.0399 -$116,892.2473
PV of cashflow yr3 = $113,790.053
Next, calculate year 3's cashflow;
Year 3 cashflow = 113790.053(1.1275)^3
Year 3 cashflow = $163,099.996
Expected cashflow in third year is approximately $163,100
Answer:
c) Adding additional project resources to the project
Explanation:
Falling behind schedule is something that needs to be avoided or dealt with promptly and systematically
Crashing is the technique to use when fast tracking has not saved enough time on the project schedule. You use crashing to save resources to the project for the least cost possible. Anyhow, crashing is expensive because more resources are added to the project.
References:
Dave. “A Step-by-Step Process of Dealing with a Project That Is Falling behind Schedule.” MyClientSpot Blog, 10 Sept. 2015
Monnappa, Avantika. “Project Management Learning Series: Fast Tracking Versus Crashing.” Simplilearn.com, Simplilearn, 27 Sept. 2019,
Considering that Alyssa is their young daughter, United States has an astounding number of tax credits and deductions that are geared towards taxpayers with children, they could claim: Credits, Deductions, exemption, Education Benefits, Education Deductions, and Education Credits, among others.
Answer:
The answer is 629,000.
Explanation:
- For each unit of M sold, the price is 7 and the cost is 3, so the contribution margin is 4;
- For each unit of N sold, the price is 4 and the cost is 2, so the contribution margin is 2;
- For each unit of O sold, the price is 6 and the cost is 3, so the contribution margin is 3;
- With the mix, 1 unit of sale contributes (contribution per mix) 3*M+1*N+2*O = 3*4+1*2+2*3 = 20
For covering the 340,000 of fixed costs, you have to sale 340,000/20 units. That's equal to 17,000 units.
Each unit of sales is equal to (price per mix) 7*M+4*N+6*O = 7*3+4*1+6*2 = 37. So, with 17,000 units, the total sales will be 17,000 * 37 = 629,000.
Answer:
At 1.783 or more, the conversion yield better gain than sales the corn
Explanation:
The ethanol conversion become attractive if the cost for doing the conversion are lower than the sale revenue for the product.
<u>total cost: raw materials + conversion cost</u>
corn price: $ 3.75
conversion cost: $ 1.60
Total cost: $ 5.35
<u>output: gallon of ethanol per bushel</u>
3 gallons of ethanol per bushel
total cost / output = 5.35/3 = 1.783 cost per gallon