No, it does not seem reasonable. The quarterly statement reports an increase of $47, so it would be a positive rate of return on the investment instead of a negative rate.
Supplementary angles are angles that add up to 180 degrees, aka one straight line. The supplementary angles here are:
1 and 2, 1 and 3, 2 and 4, 3 and 4, 5 and 6, 6 and 8, 7 and 8, and 6 and 7. Well, those are the more obvious ones. 1 and 7 are supplementary because if you envision them next to each other, you’ll see that they create a straight line. So, with that logic, 3 and 5 are supplementary because when you put them together, they create a straight line
Divide the sale price by the original price:
56 / 89 = 0.7
Multiply by 100:
0.7 x 100 = 70%
The sale price is 70% of the original price, so the discount would be 30% (100-70= 30)
Using proportions, it is found that $147.8 billion was spent on television advertising in the previous year.
- $x, in billions, was spent on advertising expenditures on television last year.
- This year, the amount declined 4.1%, hence it is 100% - 4.1% = 95.9% of last year's amount, that is, 0.959x.
This year spending's is of 141.7 billion, hence, the equation is:
$147.8 billion was spent on television advertising in the previous year.
To learn more about proportions, you can take a look at brainly.com/question/24372153
Answer:
4 units i think
Step-by-step explanation:
i dont know how beacuse 4 is answer
