Answer: the Byzantines were able to maintain their main areas. There were no attacks by tribal or pastoral people on Anatolia or Egypt, and just a few in the Black Sea region. For the most part the Byzantine Empire was not an expansionist empire, and this gave it more stability.
The tax system and the bureaucracy were already in place, and the bureaucracy acted as a check on the nobility. It was good way for them to earn reputation by serving in the government. Under Justinian, a law code was created. It came directly from the emperor, establishing him as the ultimate authority on justice. This was an important check on the power of the nobility as well , helping to keep them from growing powerful enough to attempt to take over the central government. It gave the imperial office a lot of authority and prestige.
Outside of Constantinople we see evidence of a strong agricultural economy. Although there were many large urban areas, the vast majority of the empire was made up of agricultural villages. They were the primary tax source and they supplied grain and agricultural products to the urban populations. At the same time, the Byzantines were the best economy in the region. They were the major trading power in the Mediterranean. They produced goods like textiles (especially silk), jewelry, and other crafts, but they also acted as the middleman for trade between east and west.
A growing cultural identity and social unity. The elements of this unity included, first and foremost, a long-lasting Roman identity. Byzantines believed they were keeping in the glorious Roman tradition, and they always presented themselves this way. Constantinople was also an important item of Byzantine unity. It was seen as the greatest city in the Mediterranean world and had overcame dozens of attacks. It was also portrayed as a whole Christian city, even if this wasn't actually true. There were lots of different kinds of Christians, plus Jews and later Muslims.
Answer:
thx for the points n mines is polo g :)
Explanation:
Hello!
Option 1: "The government cannot be run by a religious group." This is true! The government cannot be run by a religious group, specifically due to religious freedom in the US. If this were allowed, American citizens who believe in different religions would begin to lose their freedom because the government would be based around a specific religion.
Option 2: "The government cannot stop people from practicing their religion." This is true! Freedom of religion is outlined in the First Amendment of the US Constitution. This means that the government cannot interfere with a person's religious beliefs, and all people have the freedom to practice any religion.
Option 3: "The government cannot make laws that religious organizations have to follow." This is false! Laws are passed for specific reasons and must be followed by all people, regardless of religion. Society must follow laws in order for them to remain effective.
Option 4: "The government cannot create a national religion." This is true! All American citizens have the right to practice any religion they choose. The government cannot create a national religion that all people need to practice.
Option 5: "The government cannot use the word "God" in any official documents or other works." This is false! The government can use the word "God" in official documents. For example, the Pledge of Allegiance (commonly recited): "I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one Nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."
I hope this helps you! Feel free to comment or PM me if you have any additional questions. Have a great day!
A dynasty is when one family rules a country or region over a long period of time. Generally, the head of the family will be the ruler of the land, like an emperor or king. When that ruler dies, another member of the family will take power, usually the oldest son.
hope this helps （╹◡╹）
