Explanation:This article is about the theory involving communist countries. For the Weather Report album, see Domino Theory (album). For the Steve Wariner song, see The Domino Theory.
An illustration of the domino theory as it had been predicted
The domino theory was a theory prominent from the 1950s to the 1980s that posited that if one country in a region came under the influence of communism, then the surrounding countries would follow in a domino effect.[1] The domino theory was used by successive United States administrations during the Cold War to justify the need for American intervention around the world.
U.S. President Dwight D. Eisenhower described the theory during an April 7, 1954, news conference, when referring to communism in Indochina:
Finally, you have broader considerations that might follow what you would call the "falling domino" principle. You have a row of dominoes set up, you knock over the first one, and what will happen to the last one is the certainty that it will go over very quickly. So you could have a beginning of a disintegration that would have the most profound influences.[2]
If we didn’t have the bill of rights, the government would find ways to make us pay for our basic rights. For example, if we don’t pay them for life, they will kill us. If we don’t pay them a liberty service fee, they kick us out.
Explanation:
2 is 3/4 of the state legislatures vote to ratify the amendment
In the United States, salary discussions among employees are protected under the national labor relations act.
The national labor relation act ( NLRA) was enacted in 1935 to protect the right of both employee and employers to encourage collective bargaining and to curtail a certain private sector of labor and management practice which could harm the general welfare of the workers
When two or more people are communicating but one of the parties is not truly responding but using cliches, usually he or she uses impersonal responses. This type of messages involve the use of generalizations, intellectualized phrases and statements that not come from personal experiences, which avoids an efficient communication.
