1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
inysia [295]
3 years ago
7

When Spanish conquistadors began their conquest of South and Central America, they met very little resistance from the Maya civi

lization there. Why were the Maya so easy for the Spanish to defeat?
A: The Mayas had joined the Incas in the mountains of South America, centuries before the Spanish arrived.

B: The Mayan culture and population had been weaked by a long-lasting and severe drought, centuries before the Spanish arrived.

C: The Mayas were a peace-loving people who were not willing to fight back against the Spanish mercenaries.

D: The Mayas had been defeated by the Aztecs and absorbed into their culture, a century before the Spanish arrived.
History
1 answer:
Ksivusya [100]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Mostly B althoguht the correct answer is that Spanish conquistadors had much more advanced weapons and horses

Explanation:

You might be interested in
How did new world migration cause religious development and cultural diversity?
Kazeer [188]
It allowed for people of any race/culture and religion to live in the same place and thus increasing religious and cultural diversity
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did many feel it was important to include the rights of due process in the Bill of Rights?
dlinn [17]

Considering Due Processor is there to ensure fair treatment and such, I'd say B is most definitely the answer.

6 0
3 years ago
In 2010 the "Patient Protection and Affordable Care het was signed into law by President Barack Obama, Though criticized by
Natali5045456 [20]

Answer:

D) federalist v. Anti federalist

4 0
3 years ago
for cases heard by the supreme court, which do you think is more important, the brief or the oral argument? why?
Nikolay [14]

A written brief in Supreme Court is much superior compared to an oral argument. A written brief proves to be the primary document from which a judge reads and understands the case. A brief is something which can be carried handy and can be used for future references.

A brief needs to be thoroughly reviewed and edited until it provides the clear outline of the case.

An oral argument can be at times too persuasive that it may bias or influence the minds of the judges and also the attorneys must be well prepared and not deviate from their defense while they present the argument.

6 0
3 years ago
How did the Crossroads region get its name?
dimaraw [331]
It is located in the center of louisiana.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What is the climax of divergent I will give brainlist
    7·1 answer
  • How has india been able to experience rapid economic growth since 1991 despite poor education and healthcare system?
    6·1 answer
  • How did the U.S. expand and gain territory in the 1800s?
    11·1 answer
  • Does the constitution specifically list powers that belong to the state?
    5·2 answers
  • 3. How did the changes affect society?
    5·2 answers
  • I need helpppp pleaseeeee
    11·2 answers
  • Can you help me with my problem?yes or no?
    10·1 answer
  • A state cannot deny anyone equal ____________________ of the state’s ___________. 13) A person cannot be put on trial __________
    5·1 answer
  • How did the number of free states and slave states change from 1789 to 1861
    5·1 answer
  • What action did Hitler take that had alliance forces declare war on<br> Germany?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!