1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lubov Fominskaja [6]
3 years ago
7

What are words that ei in them

Social Studies
2 answers:
IRISSAK [1]3 years ago
7 0
Either, heist, their, seized
luda_lava [24]3 years ago
5 0
Receive, seize, ceiling, weight, weird

do you need more
You might be interested in
Which of the following is NOT a likely metric for its objective?​
artcher [175]

Increase sharing of blog content on Twitter by 25%, measured by number of posts on Twitter  is not likely metric for its objective

Explanation:

Strategy is considered to be an abstract vague aspect in business when compared to metrics which is a key aspect in business. Metrics are focused in order to drive the business into a developmental mode.  

The range of metrics that company adopts varies. Some legal and contractual metrics are applied in business sin order to earn huge profits. Metrics are measures which gives the numeric figure in the development process of the business. It helps in measuring the financial stability of the business.  

3 0
4 years ago
When 13-year-old ted comes out of the locker room in his gym shorts, he hears some girls laughing nearby and assumes they are la
vlada-n [284]
The correct answer is t<span>he imaginary audience. 

</span>According to the psychologist Elkind, imaginary audience refers to a phenomenon wherein adolescents feel like they are under constant scrutiny and are being judged and observed by others.  Adolescents believe that they are under constant scrutiny because of the changes and growth their body and physiology is going through during adolescence. The imaginary audience phase is a common phenomenon that adolescents experience.  
5 0
3 years ago
Explain 5 major effects of Colonization on Africa.
PtichkaEL [24]

Answer:

Colonization did a number on Africa, but it wasn’t all bad (look at me trying to justify the actions of our tormentors). But joking aside colonization was responsible for one of humanity’s worst atrocities slavery... you know what, let me use a pros and cons list coz I just might end up rambling

"Cons"

Plundering of Africa’s natural resources. When European colonialists came to Africa, they came looking for raw materials for their industries (African countries started to be colonized right around the time the industrial revolution had taken root and spread all over Europe). There were also other economic and political reasons for invading Africa.

Slavery. When the colonialists came and found our great grandparents (yes it wasn’t that long ago), they found that we hadn’t developed to anything close their level. Africans were living in simple communities, we had just gone beyond hunters and gatherers and had begun adopting farming, animal keeping and participating in barter trade. We had what you would consider a rudimentary government and hierarchical leadership structures. And in terms of weaponry we had machetes, spears and shields made from dried animal hides. So when the Colonialists rolled up on our shores and saw this they thought, why trade while we can just point our guns at them and take whatever we want and kill whoever would try and stop us. Turns out it’s pretty easy to get someone to do your bidding after threatening to kill them and their whole community. So one after the other Africans were loaded onto ships, literally stockpiled to be used and sold.

Colonialists became vastly wealthy. I mean they were getting natural resources for next to nothing (okay the whips, chains, guns and boats big enough to carry as much stuff as possible weren’t free) and to top it all off free slave labour, then selling their products for a hefty profit. They were raking it in big at our expense.

Erosion of our culture. Communities were split up and others erased from existence all together. During the scramble and partition of Africa, colonialists paid no mind to the people that lived there. Clans were destroyed, communities split up and missionaries had us abandon practices that they considered backward. Communities that resisted, in some instances, had their entire villages burnt down. In West Africa, however, the French adopted the indirect method of rule, which involved assimilating Africans. This meant abandoning their language, beliefs, culture and adopting the ways of the French, but this seemed better than the alternative.

Africans were displaced from their land and concentrated into small settlements. This led to terrible living conditions and spread of diseases. White colonialist settlers accumulated huge tracts of land which after independence resulted to one of the worst land inequalities in the world, and lets not forget about apartheid.

We were dragged into a war that didn’t concern us. Hundreds of thousands of Africans were asked to “volunteer” to fight in WW2 and those that didn’t “volunteer” were forced to fight, as if they had a choice.

They forever altered our course of development. Europeans had the opportunity to go through the agrarian revolution then the industrial revolution and then proceed into the modern age. Some African communities were just beginning their agrarian revolution; we had started keeping animals, and adopted farming. We had even just started transitioning from barter trade to using our simple currencies (shells, beads, gold). I mean this was a burgeoning economy in its infancy when the Europeans decided to mess all that up.

Neo-colonialism. After colonization, the Europeans could no longer take whatever they wanted, we could now trade with Europeans. However there was a catch, we could only trade with our colonial masters. This eliminated competition (so how much you wanna bet we were getting a raw deal?). Another stipulation was that, we could only export raw materials thereby inhibiting the rate at which our local African industries could develop. Furthermore, there was to be preferential treatment to the colonialist settlers who chose to remain in the former colonies, from tax exemptions to allowing them to keep the huge tracts of land they had acquired for themselves.

8 0
3 years ago
How many states or in the u.s.a?
MArishka [77]
50 states are in the united states.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is immigration define in your own words​
mash [69]

Answer:

It is leaving your home country and going to a new one

Explanation:

hope this helped!

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Three-year-old Jonathan saw fireworks that were repeatedly followed by loud fear-producing explosive sounds. The mere sight of f
    13·2 answers
  • One support of the behavioral perspective is that it is backed by strong and extensive research. Please select the best answer f
    13·2 answers
  • At first, gilgamesh is able to confront humbaba face to face because
    10·1 answer
  • Bosnia : what is the status of ethnic cleansing or genocide today?
    15·1 answer
  • How are different religions interdependent?​
    14·1 answer
  • To what extend does the Greensboro sit-in showcase effectiveness of active citizenship
    12·1 answer
  • low income people are having troubles with fordable housing in the city of phoenix, so the government Sets a rent controls where
    8·1 answer
  • Information professionals and officers are asked to focus only on their specific tasks and let strategic officers consider the b
    6·1 answer
  • 2. How could you use a thematic map?
    7·1 answer
  • Dark areas of the map represent places that are very windy. Wind energy is arguably the cleanest source of power. If you were co
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!