1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kkurt [141]
3 years ago
7

Advertising expenses are a significant component of the cost of goods sold. Listed below is a frequency distribution showing the

advertising expenditures for 75 manufacturing companies located in the Southwest. The mean expense is $50.93 million and the standard deviation is $10.80 million. Is it reasonable to conclude the sample data are from a population that follows a normal probability distribution? Advertising Expense ($ Million) Number of Companies 25 up to 35 4 35 up to 45 19 45 up to 55 27 55 up to 65 16 65 up to 75 9 Total 75
Mathematics
1 answer:
Alexxandr [17]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The table can be computed as:

Advertising Expenses ($ million)     Number of companies

25 up to 35                                                    4

35 up to 45                                                    19

45 up to 55                                                    27

55 up to 65                                                    16

65 up to 75                                                     9

TOTAL                                                            75

Let's find the probabilities first:

P(25 - 35) = P \Big(\dfrac{25-50.93}{10.80}

For 35 up to 45

P(35 - 45) = P \Big(\dfrac{35-50.93}{10.80}

For 45 up to 55

P(45 - 55) = P \Big(\dfrac{45-50.93}{10.80}

For 55 up to 65

P(55 - 65) = P \Big(\dfrac{55-50.93}{10.80}

For 65 up to 75

P(65 - 75) = P \Big(\dfrac{65-50.93}{10.80}

Chi-Square Table can be computed as follows:

Expense   No of   Probabilities(P)  Expe                (O-E)^2   \dfrac{(O-E)^2}{E}

             compa                                 cted E (n*p)

             nies (O)  

25-35           4      0.0612    75*0.0612 = 4.59        0.3481       0.0758

35-45           19     0.2218   75*0.2218 = 16.635     5.5932       0.3362

45-55           27     0.3568   75*0.3568 = 26.76     0.0576      0.021

55-65           16      0.2552   75*0.2552 = 19.14      9.8596      0.5151

65-75           9      0.0839     75*0.0839 = 6.2925   7.331         1.1650

                                                                                           \sum \dfrac{(O-E)^2}{E}= 2.0492                                                                                                      

Using the Chi-square formula:

X^2 = \dfrac{(O-E)^2}{E} \\ \\ Chi-square  \ X^2 = 2.0942

Null hypothesis:

H_o: \text{The population of advertising expenses follows a normal distribution}

Alternative hypothesis:  

H_a: \text{The population of advertising expenses does not follows a normal distribution}

Assume that:

\alpha = 0.02

degree of freedom:

= n-1

= 5 -1

= 4

Critical value from X^2 = 11.667

Decision rule: To reject H_o  \  if \  X^2  test statistics is greater than X^2 tabulated.

Conclusion: Since X^2 = 2.0942 is less than critical value 11.667. Then we fail to reject H_o

You might be interested in
Tell which number is greater.<br><br> 1/3, 30%
Olin [163]
Mhm pretty sure 1/3
8 0
3 years ago
Lie detectors have a 15% chance of concluding that a person is lying even when they are telling the truth. a bank conducts inter
Otrada [13]
Part A:

Given that lie <span>detectors have a 15% chance of concluding that a person is lying even when they are telling the truth. Thus, lie detectors have a 85% chance of concluding that a person is telling the truth when they are indeed telling the truth.

The case that the lie detector correctly determined that a selected person is saying the truth has a probability of 0.85
Thus p = 0.85

Thus, the probability that </span>the lie detector will conclude that all 15 are telling the truth if <span>all 15 applicants tell the truth is given by:

</span>P(X)={ ^nC_xp^xq^{n-x}} \\  \\ \Rightarrow P(15)={ ^{15}C_{15}(0.85)^{15}(0.15)^0} \\  \\ =1\times0.0874\times1=0.0874
<span>

</span>Part B:

Given that lie detectors have a 15% chance of concluding that a person is lying even when they are telling the truth. Thus, lie detectors have a 85% chance of concluding that a person is telling the truth when they are indeed telling the truth.

The case that the lie detector wrongly determined that a selected person is lying when the person is actually saying the truth has a probability of 0.25
Thus p = 0.15

Thus, the probability that the lie detector will conclude that at least 1 is lying if all 15 applicants tell the truth is given by:

P(X)={ ^nC_xp^xq^{n-x}} \\ \\ \Rightarrow P(X\geq1)=1-P(0) \\  \\ =1-{ ^{15}C_0(0.15)^0(0.85)^{15}} \\ \\ =1-1\times1\times0.0874=1-0.0874 \\  \\ =0.9126


Part C:

Given that lie detectors have a 15% chance of concluding that a person is lying even when they are telling the truth. Thus, lie detectors have a 85% chance of concluding that a person is telling the truth when they are indeed telling the truth.

The case that the lie detector wrongly determined that a selected person is lying when the person is actually saying the truth has a probability of 0.15
Thus p = 0.15

The mean is given by:

\mu=npq \\  \\ =15\times0.15\times0.85 \\  \\ =1.9125


Part D:

Given that lie detectors have a 15% chance of concluding that a person is lying even when they are telling the truth. Thus, lie detectors have a 85% chance of concluding that a person is telling the truth when they are indeed telling the truth.

The case that the lie detector wrongly determined that a selected person is lying when the person is actually saying the truth has a probability of 0.15
Thus p = 0.15

The <span>probability that the number of truthful applicants classified as liars is greater than the mean is given by:

</span>P(X\ \textgreater \ \mu)=P(X\ \textgreater \ 1.9125) \\  \\ 1-[P(0)+P(1)]
<span>
</span>P(1)={ ^{15}C_1(0.15)^1(0.85)^{14}} \\  \\ =15\times0.15\times0.1028=0.2312<span>
</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Total power generated by wind worldwide doubles every 3 years. In a particular year, the world wind-generating capacity was abou
IceJOKER [234]
<span>You are given the sum of the power created by wind worldwide which doubles every 3 years. In one an unknown year, the world wind generating capacity was about 91 thousand megawatts. You are asked for the growth rate. the growth rate formula is given below:

growth rate = (present / past)^(1/n)
2 = (present/91MW)^(1/3)
the present power is 728MW</span>
7 0
2 years ago
How do you do this?????
o-na [289]

y = 2x - 9

Step-by-step explanation:

Let's rewrite the given equation such that only y is on the left side and everything else on the right side:

3x + 6y = -30 \Rightarrow 6y = -3x - 30

Simplifying this by dividing by 6, we get

y = -\frac{1}{2}x - 5

This line has a slope of -1/2, which means that a line perpendicular to this has a slope of 2 (i.e., negative reciprocal). So we can write its equation as

y = 2x + b

This is the slope-intercept form of the equation of the line perpendicular to our given line. To complete this form, we need to find the value of b. Since this line passes through (1, -7), put these numbers into our equation to get

-7 = 2(1) + b \Rightarrow b = -9

Therefore, the slope-intercept form of the equation can be written as

y = 2x - 9

3 0
2 years ago
Number 7 thanks ASAP ASAP
stellarik [79]

Answer:

Price is $1088 (agrees with answer B)

Step-by-step explanation:

Notice that the linear equation that represents this relationship can be estimated via finding the slope and y-intercept using a couple of the given points on the plane (for example (5, 140), and (10, 200), which results in;

Price = 12 x + 80

where "x" is the number of computers shipped.

Then, to ship 84 computers, we have the following price:

Price = 12 (84) + 80 = 1088

Then the price is $1088.

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • jill measured the length of her eraser. She wrote 5 on her paper without the unit. Which metric unit of measure should Jill incl
    11·1 answer
  • How do you simplify i²⁹? (If you can't tell, that's the imaginary number i^29).
    8·1 answer
  • You run one lap around a mile track every 8 minuets. Your friend runs around the same track every 10 minutes. You both start at
    6·1 answer
  • The percentage of water in an unknown hydrate was determined by heating the sample and driving the water off the sample. Two ind
    13·1 answer
  • 11/5 - 7/4 + 2/1 evaluate​
    10·1 answer
  • A rectangle has a length of 14 inches and a width of 1 foot. What is the area in square inches?
    9·1 answer
  • The diagram shows a right angled triangle.
    7·1 answer
  • What are all the factors of 32? A 2, 4, 8, 16 B 1, 2, 16, 32 C 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32 D 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 32
    10·2 answers
  • (5x)^3It’s asking me to evaluate pls help
    8·1 answer
  • How do I solve Cos-1(0.839) step by step?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!