1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Kaylis [27]
3 years ago
9

What is a country that wants to increase it's per capita gdp trying to achieve​

History
1 answer:
tensa zangetsu [6.8K]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

If the population stays the same, an increase in GDP grows income per capita. There are several ways to increase GDP: Education and training. Greater education and job skills allow individuals to produce more goods and services, start businesses and earn higher incomes.

You might be interested in
What is the first world cup held<br><br><br>​
suter [353]

Answer:

July 13, 1930

Explanation:

On July 13, 1930, France defeats Mexico 4-1 and the United States defeats Belgium 3-0 in the first-ever World Cup football matches, played simultaneously in host city Montevideo, Uruguay.

7 0
2 years ago
And whereas the said late King James the Second having abdicated the government, and the throne being thereby vacant, his Highne
gavmur [86]

Answer:

Explanation:

1. That the pretended power of suspending laws, or the execution of laws, by regal authority, without consent of parliament is illegal.

2. That the pretended power of dispensing with the laws, or the execution of law by regal authority, as it hath been assumed and exercised of late, is illegal.

3. That the commission for erecting the late court of commissioners for ecclesiastical causes, and all other commissions and courts of like nature, are illegal and pernicious.

4. That levying money for or to the use of the crown by pretense of prerogative, without grant of parliament, for longer time or in other manner than the same is or shall be granted, is illegal.

5. That it is the right of the subjects to petition the king, and all commitments and prosecutions for such petitioning are illegal.

6. That the raising or keeping a standing army within the kingdom in time of peace, unless it be with consent of parliament, is against law.

7. That the subjects which are Protestants may have arms for their defense suitable to their conditions, and as allowed by law.

8. That election of members of parliament ought to be free.

9. That the freedom of speech, and debates or proceedings in parliament, ought not to be impeached or questioned in any court or place out of parliament.

10. That excessive bail ought not to be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

11. That jurors ought to be duly impaneled and returned, and jurors which pass upon men in trials for high treason ought to be freeholders.

12. That all grants and promises of fines and forfeitures of particular persons before conviction are illegal and void.

13. And that for redress of all grievances, and for the amending, strengthening, and preserving of the laws, parliament ought to be held frequently.                                                  

sry if its not the answer you were looking for. It worked for me but it might just be my thing sry again if its not

5 0
3 years ago
After the eruption of Mount St. Helen’s, what lesson did biological legacies teach, and astonished, scientists?
beks73 [17]

The eruption of Mount St. Helens 35 years ago provided an amazing opportunity for scientists to study the effects of catastrophe. The incredible lessons are as valuable as ever!

Awesome Science Volumes 1 - 12: DVD Pack Shop Now

May 18, 2015, marks the 35th anniversary of one of the most violent natural disasters of our modern time, the colossal 1980 eruption of Mount St. Helens in Washington state. Its explosive power shocked the world and made headline news. Fifty-seven people died, over $1 billion worth of property was destroyed, and over 230 square miles (600 km2) of forests were immediately flattened. Recent rumblings are again making news, raising fears that the volcano may be reawakening.

While the losses were tragic, the value to science has been inestimable. Geologists vastly improved their ability to predict eruptions, safely evacuating tens of thousands of Filipino people before Pinatubo erupted in 1991. Scientists began learning many other valuable lessons, some of which have challenged the foundations of evolutionary thinking.

Harry R. Truman

Copyright Bettmann/Corbis / AP Images

Harry R. Truman, who operated a lodge near Mount St. Helens for over fifty years, became a folk hero when he refused to evacuate. “The mountain is a mile away,” he told reporters. “The mountain ain’t gonna hurt me.” He and his lodge were later buried under 150 feet (46 m) of debris.

The eruption of Mount St. Helens is often regarded as the most significant geologic event of the twentieth century. Since the volcano was conveniently located in Washington state, only two hours’ drive from Portland, scientists could document the eruption in unprecedented detail. Although not the most powerful explosion on record, it provided a natural laboratory for understanding how quickly catastrophic processes can reshape the earth, and how rapidly wildlife can recover.

Within moments of eruption, the whole northern side of the mountain (two-thirds of a cubic mile of rock) slid away—the largest observed landslide on record. The eruption lasted nine hours, followed by more eruptions over the next six years. Geologists, who are accustomed to thinking about slow evolutionary processes shaping our world, were astounded by the scale of initial destruction and the speed at which new geologic features formed. Thirty-five years later, Mount St. Helens still teaches us lessons about the powerful forces the Creator used to shape the earth. These findings confront the underlying slow-and-gradual assumptions of modern geologic thinking, and they give us invaluable clues about the catastrophic potential of a global, cataclysmic Flood.

7 0
2 years ago
How did india's imperialism end?
jeka94

Answer:

ggggggdhhdhhhhdhdhdh

3 0
3 years ago
How do you view this decision's impact on election reform and free speech? Write a paragraph of at least five sentences explaini
Inessa [10]

Answer: or  this question , I believe this decision is a step in the right direction because the First Amendment is a very important part to our Constitution and how our government is shaped. America is built on the idea of a democracy and that the people rule and have more say. The First Amendment plays a huge part in allowing that right to remain with the citizens. It is especially important around elections because during elections the people are choosing who will represent them in government and help influence the other branches to make specific changes. Allowing political expression increases the people’s confidence in the government

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What colony did Roger Williams found?
    8·1 answer
  • Why did the British fight the French in 1754?
    5·1 answer
  • Which body of water lies east of the Arabian Peninsula?
    5·2 answers
  • Which two arguments did Fred Korematsu present against internment?
    6·2 answers
  • If an official other than the president is impeached, then the
    15·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP MEEEEE
    9·1 answer
  • What did the British redcoats do during the Boston Massacre in 1770
    7·1 answer
  • HEY CAN ANYONE PLS ANSWER DIS!!!
    5·1 answer
  • 3. Congress has tried to replace the Electoral College with a simple popular vote numerous times. Why has this attempt never bee
    8·1 answer
  • did the delegates of the Continental Congress have the right to send a letter expressing their concerns to King George III in 17
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!