Answer:
A would be correct.
Explanation:
The other ones are too random and its the only one that makes since to me. the first one could actually be a summary. Also nice Forky.
Answer:
fun
activities
fun
productive
meet
Explanation:
my first language is English so these should be correct (:
Answer:
The correct answer is <u>C</u>: the fact that this is the first day Ryan has ever been turkey hunting.
Explanation:
At the beginning of the excerpt, the author mentions that this is the first day Ryan has ever been turkey hunting. After describing the setting (when he got up, where they went, what they did, etc.), the author mentions again the fact that Ryan has never been turkey hunting and says this is his first time. Therefore, it should be removed from the second part of the excerpt.
When you act or behave a certain way purposely it's because you are motivated to act out that specific behavior so you already know what the results will be for your actions. This can cause awareness, because when you know what the result will be, that shows that you understand and are very much aware of your surroundings, which causes you to act that way purposely. This leads to more understanding. I hope that was good and makes sense.
Answer:
<u>Claim:</u> the voting age should be lowered to 16 years old.
<u>Opposing claim:</u> some people are against it because they believe that 16 years olds can not make informed decisions and are going to vote according to whim or how their parents tell them to vote.
<u>Counterclaim:</u> lowering the voting age is more likely to produce a better-informed body of voters since school can help them with courses for such thing.
Explanation:
The claim in this text is that the voting age should be lowered since young people deserve to have a say in the direction of the country. Some of the reasons supporting this claim are that 16-year-olds are mature enough for this decision in contrast with teenagers of previous generations as shown in studies. Also, they are more informed and competent than adults.
The opposing claim states that 16 years olds are not well informed, and they will vote according to what their parents tell them to vote or without consciousness. There are no investigations in the article that support the opposing claim.
The counterclaim says that as 16-year-olds are still in school, the education system can develop instruction courses to teach them about the candidates. As they have the right to vote, students will be motivated to learn about this topic.
